Monday, September 29, 2008

Proof Positive: Mac Users Are Better Multi-Taskers Than Window Users!


Today, I will be attending to a very important function and won't have the time to do my regular posting, but that's ok, because thanks to one of the better Macintosh sites out there, Macenstein, I do have the time at least to post proof positive, as you can see in the above photo, that when it comes to multi-tasking, no body, and I mean no body, be they a Windows or even a Linux user, can quite multi-task the way that we Mac users can, and, especially, as you can see with this girl, look so absolutely adorable, beautiful and as sexy while doing so!


So, there you have it, without photographic proof that a Windows or Linux users out there can actually surf the net, talk on the telephone and breast feed, while, at the same time, playing the banjo, juggling the dishes, washing the car, milking the cow, or what ever, then I think that you Window and Linux users are just going to have to admit that we Mac users, being the smug users that we are, really are superior at least when it comes to multi-tasking!


Case closed. Sorry, ain't going to top this one, all you Linux and Window losers out there! (whoops, I meant users, not losers!)


Even though I like to think that I'm also a good multi-tasker, I have to confess, that I still probably couldn't  multi-task quite in the same capacity as she can, let alone looking as good as as she! A lot of people, of course, consider Mac's to be very sexy looking machines, but apparently, as you can plainly see, some Mac users tend to be a lot sexier than others, including the machines themselves?


So, until tomorrow and my next regular post, have a great one!


Image via: Macenstein,


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Tuesday, September 30, 2008.


PS: All Linux and Window users, for the record, please note: I'm only kidding! Personally, I think that Windows and Linux users are just as smart, nice and as wonderful as anyone else, Mac users included. I just couldn't resist resist having fun with such a beautiful and obviously, very talented girl! Of course, your just as nice and smart and all, but - we Mac users are still prettier! (Ok, ok, I'm just kidding again!)


Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!


Who's To Blame for Apple's Stock Woes?

It seems that Apple's high-flying stock days are over! Thanks, in part, to the worsening credit crisis, Apple's stock has plunged big time. From a high of over $200 and a market cap of over $172 billion, Apple's stock has slid all the way down  from the previous close of $128 dollars per share to, as of this writing,  down some $20.46 per share! 


To me, this makes absolutely no sense at all. Of all of the high tech companies out there, Apple is not only one of the best managed, but also one of the most, if not the most, profitable companies of all times! Analysts, fearful over the general economy, seem to be panicking, but strangely more so concerning Apple than other companies , companies that just happen to be no where near as healthy as Apple. I find this strange, if not down right bizarre. Even though the economy, as a whole, is suffering, Apple as a company is not, so why is it's stock being punished?


Could this be because of hedge managers? Not long ago Steve Jobs told a reported that he thought it could be. By manipulating a stock, they can drive the stock down and then pick it up at cheap prices. Then all they have to do is wait for it to rightfully resume it's price as it goes back up! It's the old, 'buy low, sell high' scenario. I am not saying that this is the case here, because I simply can't know for sure, but frankly it wouldn't surprise me one little bit if this was the case. For one thing, it really strikes me as being odd, very, very odd indeed. It certainly can't be normal, can it?  


Of course, I'm not the only one who finds it odd that the best managed and most profitable of all high tech companies could have suddenly lost 16% of it's value in a single day,  sending Apple's market cap below 100 billion. At one time, and not that very long ago, Apple's market cap was bigger than anyone in high tech, outside of Microsoft that is! It was bigger than Google's, IBM's, HPQ's and you name it. Among others who find this precipitous sell off as being rather strange is Jim Goldman, who writing for CNBC, in his Tech Check column says: 


"It's not often--like almost never--that you see a downgrade parade like the one for Apple this morning, that doesn't follow earnings or some kind of catalyst."


You can say that again! 


Maybe I'm crazy, but something smells a little fishy here. For one thing, the very fact that one or more analyst's can just say a few words that results in a healthy company losing tens of billions - that's right, tens of billions of dollars, and all that in mere minutes, says to me that something has to got change. Something is definitely wrong here. People might say that it doesn't matter because they don't own any Apple stock, but the fact remains, a lot of people do. I just don't mean people who speculate on stocks in hopes of making a quick buck, but thousands, no millions of ordinary people who's employers, on their behalf, invest their retirement plans in those same stocks. If those retirement investments lose, then likewise, so do those retirements funds, and so do those employes, and it puts their very retirement pensions directly in danger! Who knows, that may even include you? 


The fact that companies like Apple can be so adversely effected just by a few words by an analyst or that of a hedge manager, should be, if at all possible, stopped! Making huge profits at the expense of others, as far as I"m concerned is illegal and something should be done about it before any more people suffer and their pensions are threatened! The question, of course, is what and how do you do that? That I don't know, I only know that something should be done about it and quick. We're not just talking about big numbers concerning big corporations here, but people's retirement pensions - their very lives and that is a big deal! A big, big deal indeed!


Mr. Goldman goes on to ask the pertinent question:


"So why now, why all of a sudden and why so much pessimism around these shares?"


He then explains that:


"Well, first things first: fundamentals be damned. I don't think this is necessarily about what Apple itself might be doing wrong. It seems to be far more "macro" than "micro." I spoke to one analyst this morning who says the economy is such a mess right now with so much concern about the consumer, that a year from now no one wants to look back and say "how could you have possibly missed that?" Whether Apple products are still selling well or not."

Of course, this only makes sense, and as he further explains, RIM's recent poor showings didn't help Apple either. The whole economy is deeply in trouble, but why should one company, Apple in this case, be singled out more than the others when it, in actual fact, is doing far better than anyone else is? God forbid if Apple was exactly losing money instead of raking it in by the barrels full or something? Then at least I could understand the fall in Apple's stock, but as it is now, it's a complete mystery to me!

As bad as the economy is now, as bad as things are, at the moment, for Apple stock, what's is by far worse and really, really sad is the fact that it's probably going to get worse, a lot worse, over the next coming months and the next few years before it gets any better! I really don't know who, or what, is to blame for Apple's recent and uncalled market sell off, but sadly, as far as I'm concerned, if one of the best run and most profitable companies in the world can suffer such dramatic loss's based, in part, on just the assumptions of a few analysts, who often end up dead being proved dead wrong at the end of the day, then we should all be afraid - very, very afraid!


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Monday, September 29, 2008.


Image via:  Yahoo Stocks


Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!


 

 


Friday, September 26, 2008

Could This Be the New MacBook Pro?


Could the above photo actually be a sneak shot at the new MacBook Pro, or is it just some elaborate Photo Shop fake? Gizmodo certainly sites various reasons as to why they think it is fake, but personally, I'm hoping it's not. Time will tell, but one thing is clear: it lives up to many of the rumors that we have been hearing over the past few months concerning the upcoming MacBook Pro.


Of particular note is the large multi-touch glass track pad with built-in video! This is probably the best form factor for a multi-touch device, well at least one with a large screen that is. If you ever played with a large touch screen, such as HP's cool new Touch Smart computers, you might have noticed, like me, that continuous swipes across such a large area can produce a type of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome effect, well, at least it did for my friend and I. With a multi-touch track pad, however, one only has to make small swipes to achieve larger swipes across a much larger screen, saving in the process, your wrists from potential pain or even injury! Besides, from personal experience with the semi multi-touch track pads found currently on the MacBook Pro's and the Air, I can safely say that they are not only more productive to use, but also much more fun to use as well!


Apart from the newer track pad and rounded corners, the overall look of the 'supposed' new MacBook Pro is very similar to the current ones. As Gizmodo pointed out, if it's a fake, I, like them, would buy one in a New York minute if Apple ever decides to come out with one. Photo Shop fake, or not, this is not only one cool looking laptop, but, dare I say, it is absolutely the most innovative concept for a laptop that I have ever come across.


According to NoWhereElse the new MacBook Pro will also share many of the visual aspects of the upcoming refresh of MacBooks, which themselves, will be modeled after the MacBook Air, and just like it, will also sport an all aluminum body, making them light, sturdy and sexy!


Of particular note, AppleInsider is stating that:


"New, however, are rumors that Apple has done away with some traditional I/O ports and altered others as it strives to marginally reduce the overall footprint of its next-gen notebooks. In particular, the FireWire 400 port appears to have been removed from the new MacBook Pro, leaving a backwards compatible FireWire 800 port. "


I'm not too sure that I like that particular rumor because, as far as I'm concerned, the more ports a computer has, the more useful it is. You can never really have enough ports, ram, hard disk capacity or speed in any computer. The more the merrier, as they say.


As far as the MacBook Pro goes, some are speculating that current rumors of a new Apple 'brick' is all about the MacBook Pro, while others, such as Tuaw, are contending that it may be an entirely new product altogether such as a 'wireless hybrid handheld Mac! This would certainly fit in with Apple's CFO, Tim Cook's, statements made earlier on new upcoming Apple products. Could this possibly be one of those new product introductions that none of it's competitor's could touch! Hopefully, we'll find out soon enough.


However, personally, I'm not really not that sure if that's the case or not. I'm thinking, well, hoping at least, that it could be something that I saw printed some time ago. What I remember reading was of a new Apple patent that combined a laptop with an iMac hybrid casing. Simply, by pressing a button, most of the insides of a computer would eject, just like a CD, revealing, in the process, a fully functioning laptop, complete with a bright LED screen! Now that is what I'm hoping it will be! This similar to an old Mac Power design of years ago, but only more sophisticated and practical. 


The advantages, of course, are obvious because - you literally could have your cake and it too! Imagine having a computer that automatically gave you the best of both world's, namely that of a desktop and that of a laptop as well! A lot of people I have met are torn between either purchasing a desktop, or that of a laptop. For such people this would be a no brainer! If this is exactly what Apple is cooking up, then, this for me, would be perfect, absolutely perfect! 


I, like just about everyone else apart from Jobs, Jonathan Ive's and other Apple big-wigs, can only guess as to what is coming down Apple's new product pipeline. I personally really don't know if what is coming, or if they will confirm to any of the rumors above, or if they will be something entirely and completely new? 


All I really know for sure is this:  what ever Apple brings out, sight unseen - I want one and I want it now!



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Friday, September 25, 2008.


Image via:  NoWhereElse



Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!


 



Thursday, September 25, 2008

Dreaming of A New Mac Net Book

Well, if your simply going by Amazon's top ten list,  then the era of the net book has finally arrived! With nine out of the ten top selling laptops now being net books, it would seem as if they were about to completely take over. Seemingly, net books have come out of nowhere and are now flooding the market with their ever so small form factors.  

Of course, what is really is amazing about this new type of laptop is that they're not only small in size and features, but more importantly - price! Net books can now be had for as little as $399 or less!  In this day and age, with an economy appearing on the very edge, they may yet become even more popular to boot.


By scanning the list, however, one very important thing catches your eye - Apple!  What is noteworthy is that Apple isn't among the growing list of manufacturers offering a net book! Not only that, but also, very, very interesting indeed, is the fact that Apple is the only manufacturer that somehow still managed to get on the top ten list with a product other than a net book! 


This is proof, if you think about it, that Apple's business model is working and is capable of surviving fads, something that many feel that the net book currently is. The mere fact that Apple can compete with a product starting at $1,278 vs the average of $300 or so for a net book is, by and of itself, a remarkable feat and a testimony of Apple's immense marketing power. 


Of course, Apple may not be yet offering any net books, but that doesn't mean it can't or won't in the future. In fact, rumors are going around that, somewhere around October 14, Apple will not only be announcing a new crop of improved and lower priced MacBooks, but also something called the 'brick'! The 'brick' could  be anything, including, what some believe will be Apple's first net book and one that would directly challenge the likes of Asus, the current leader. Of course, the 'brick' could be something entirely else, but many, myself included, are really dreaming that it will indeed be Apple's first net book.


If Apple where to indeed introduced another net book, just what could we actually be expected to see? Well, for starters, it would be running OS X,  and that's a given. But what else? Well, Apple being Apple, it probably wouldn't be one of the cheaper net books, be that in build-quality, feature set, performance or in price! Some of the higher end net books cost upwards of $700 or more, and much more akin to any price that Apple would probably deliver, if it delivers at all.  


Another thing that we could be expected to see, and this is just a personal guess  of mine, is colors, colors and even more colors! Something, maybe along the lines of the recently introduced iPod Nanos and it's dazzling chromatic colors. Maybe in all aluminum like the MacBook Air, but only with all those cool colors? Also, like the Air, most likely, we wouldn't see any enclosed DVD drive. Net books, after all, are still primarily word processing and internet surfing devices rather then super-duper gaming or entertaining devices. 


I have no idea when, what, or even if Steve Jobs is ever going to come on stage and introduce a net book, but I do know what I would like to see. 


For one, even though net books are not really that suited as being entertainment computers, I still think it would be great, even though doubtful, that any Apple Mac Net Book would double as an iPod and radio! Yes, just imagine a 10 inch iPod, only this time with the much requested built-in radio tuner! This would basically be a super sized (yet still small) iPod on steroids, that just happened to surf the net and did word processing on the side! Would it cannibalize iPod sales? To a degree, but not really, since it could  also be thought of being just as much of an iPod as much as it was a net book!


Ok, since I'm just dreaming here, I will go even further out on a limb and suggest, and this is all it is folks, just a suggestion, that it could also include G3 telephony abilities! That's right, it would be not just a net book, an iPod, or a radio, but also - an iPhone! Oh, and while were at it, let's throw in a television tuner to go along side that radio tuner! I mean, seriously, I'm not totally serious here, but rather just dreaming on the edge a bit.


Whether or not Apple comes out with a new MacBook Net book computer with all those crazy add on features of mine, or not, I still would dearly love to see Apple introduce some kind of a net book and soon. With net books making up 9 out of the ten top selling laptop computers on Amazon, I think that Apple really can't afford to not to introduce one, or it will lose considerable face as the industry passes them by. 


Net books, may be a fad according to some, but, in the meantime, they are having a very big impact on the market and if other manufacturers can do well with them, well, just imagine what Apple could do? I could be wrong, of course, but I'm convinced that Apple not only could create a new and viable net book, but, one that would be, without a doubt, the very best and coolest net book ever created, and one that could possibly take the net book by storm just like the iPhone and iPod did in their respective circles as well! 



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Thursday, September 25, 2008.


Image of Ausus Net Book:   MyCe101


Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!


 



Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Is Apple Dooming iPhone App Development?


Apple, over all, has done a splendid job when they created the industry changing iPhone. Jonathan Ive's design prowess is unequalled and it shows in the iPhone's sleek and minimalist body and feature set. However, despite Apple's successful implementation of multi-touch and other cool features, Apple is now doing what a lot of people find extremely irritating, annoying and down right arrogant, and not to mention, extremely counter productive, namely - it's shameful handling of it's App Store developers!

There has been a growing ruckus in the press and blogs about Apple's handling, or should I say, miss-handling, of the whole process of accepting or rejecting developers and their apps, as was the case with the developer of a very desirable app called, PodCaster, among many other apps.

I must agree with GearDiary when they stated:

"I caught this during the morning site run over at iPhone Alley. In what feels (to me) as the ultimate B-slap, Apple has blocked the ad-hoc distribution of Alex Sokirynsky’s rejected application, Podcaster, just one among many.

'As if their app distribution practices weren’t unpopular enough, Podcaster developer Alex Sokirynsky wrote in a blog post that has already been removed (probably because it violated his NDA) that Apple has cut him off from distributing any more legitimate copies of Podcaster though their ad hoc distribution method.'

I’m not sure what size gun (12-gage shot gun or bazooka) Apple is using to remove their appendages, but this one just seems a bit heavy handed to me, though, honestly, not unexpected. I’ve been talking to other Gear Diary Team members about this issue, and one thing is clear - something needs to change at Apple."

How true! This bullying tactic (let's call it what it is) has got to stop because, as a dedicated Apple user, I feel that such tactics will only play into the hands of Apple's competitor's. What I feel Apple is doing not only reaches a new height in Apple's arrogance, but business wise, it could end up being a very deadly one, and one that will hurt the iPhone a lot more than it helps it.

If, like me, you just happened to catch T-Mobile's G1 Android presentation yesterday, you couldn't help but notice the importance that they paid in highlighting that Android was an open system, unlike a certain other system (the iPhone's) and that Google's App Store would be free, easy and offer unlimited apps (unlike Apple's App Store). Plainly, with-out-a-doubt, they are gunning for all iPhone developers, with wide-open arms, to jump ship from developing for the iPhone to develop instead for Android. I don't know how many will go for this, but it could be a big win for the Android community and a very big loss for the iPhone community.

Apple is out of touch and should immediately stop this madness! This is a madness that it will eventually end up paying a big price for if it losses a lot of it's current developer's support. Apple's handling of the App Store approval process has given it and the iPhone a black eye. If Apple continues with it's self-serving and arrogant ways it will lose one of the biggest advantages of the iPhone - it's base of independent app developers. This could be a fatal blow for the best smart phone ever developed, something that need not be.

As InnerDaemon points out:

"It’s under NDA but evidently Apple rejected Microsoft Office for the Mac because it competes with Apple’s iWork. Also, Firefox was rejected because it could confuse users about which to browser to use.

Other candidates on the reject list include NetNewsWire, RealPlayer, and Lightroom."

Very well said, but you could also easily add a whole other list of apps such as Photo Shop and others to the mix. Clearly this is madness on Apple's part and it would make for great satire, if only it wasn't so, but sadly it is! It's anything but funny what Apple is doing, I mean - are they suicidal or what? I can't for the life of me understand why Apple would hurt developers who are only intent on helping Apple give it's customers not only more choices, but better choices and, at the same time, give Apple and the iPhone a leg up on the competition!

If, like others, you also find Apple's miss-handling of it's App Store developers is blatantly wrong, and detrimental to the iPhone platform, you can do what I did and sign your name to a newly formed petition that hopefully will get Apple's attention and get it to wise-the-hell-up before it's too late and get it to do what is in the best interests of it's customers and the iPhone platform!

Will Apple listen? Will they wake up before it's too late? I don't know, but, for the sake of the iPhone platform, I sure hope so!



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Wednesday, September 23, 2008.

Image: Apple

Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!

when they state:

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Google's Android vs Apple's iPhone - Which is Better, Which Will Come Out On Top!

Even though some think that the upcoming new Android based phones won't be as  exciting  as the iPhone itself, none--the-less, I personally think that they will certainly appeal to a lot of people and from the live introduction, that I just witnessed,  it looks like Android phones will also become the biggest threat to the iPhone that it has faced in it's brief history  and, not to mention, also, at the same time, the biggest threat ever to WindowsMobile and Smybian based phones.


From the live introduction, it was very obvious, that they were giving Apple the bum's rap by highlighting the short comings of the iPhone's SDK. Basically, they bragged on how open Android's development was as compared to that of a closed one (iPhone), highlighting that anyone can easily download the Android developers kit without the need for a lot of paper work, or the fear of developer app's fate being decided or rejected by a third party (Apple) !


However, will the Google's Android actually make a big difference to either the iPhone, WindowsMobile and Symbian? You bet it will! Even though the first Android device is not as sexy or as polished as the iPhone, it still has many attributes that will make it a big success and it will definitely make a big difference in the world of mobile phones, including that of the iPhone. Yes, people may point out that Android is only copying the iPhone, but frankly people really don't care about that, all they care about is having a phone that works great and does so cheaply and Android certainly should give them that and a whole lot more. 


The question is:  what , if anything, can Apple do to neutralize any threat and keep such threats to a minimum? After all, if people preceive that they can get a phone that does most, all, or even more than the iPhone, all at lower cost and without all of the restrictions associated with the iPhone, then why in hell would anybody still want to buy an iPhone? Good question and it needs some pretty good answers if Apple wants to avoid disappointing future iPhone sales.


First of all, Apple will need some more time to reflect on any Android threat, but ,in the meantime, the folks in Redmond are the ones who should really be the most concerned. After all, Android based phones won't need manufacturer's to pay for any licensing fees and from what I can see, Android already offers more features and usability than either that of  WindowsMobile or Symbian. Theoretically,  Android could, in time, not only harm them, but maybe, just maybe kill them both off. I could be wrong, but after reading and seeing Android in action, I certainly think that's a very real possibility, especially when you consider that this is only Android's  first version - just think where this will end up in it's second and third generation?


Android  impact, in the short term, certainly won't help the iPhone, but in the long haul it might actually help, by forcing Apple to open up and compete much more aggressively. For example, even though Apple' App Store has been a great success, cracks have begun to appear. This is especially true regarding Apple's handling of how apps are accepted or rejected. This has been a sore spot with developers and hopefully Apple will give them some more slack or else they will potentially lose a lot of these developers to the Android developer community.  


Now that Google is directly in competition with Apple and it's hot iPhone, what will become of it's close relationship with Apple and that of Eric Schmidt's role on Apple's board of directors? Whether Google will be as successful in mobile phones, as it has been in the search field, has yet to  be determined, but I'm pretty certain that, in the end, Google's Android based phones will prove to be very popular, but whether it will be enough to seriously damage the iPhone I'm not sure? 


We all know how the iPhone has completely changed the face of the mobile world, but what we don't know yet is how Android will change the face of the iPhone? Google and Apple are both close partners, and yet, at the same time, competitor's, so it will be interesting to see how these two giants act and react to each other's mobile strategies. Will they become closer, or more distant to each other? I don't know, but I do know that whatever happens between them, it will be interesting to watch.  Very interesting indeed.



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Tuesday, September 23, 2008.


Image: Mirror.uk


Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!


 

   

Monday, September 22, 2008

iPhone Competitor's: Can They Beat the iPhone?


The iPhone is clearly the best dang cell phone ever created and is head-and-shoulders above the competition. Of course, that is the case today, but will that be the case tomorrow - will the iPhone be able to compete against the horde of wannabee iPhone killers that are appearing seemingly now on a daily basis? 


Apple is now selling iPhones by the millions and  Philip Elmer-DeWitt , writing for Fortune, is reporting  that Piper Jaffray's Gen Munster is projecting that Apple will sell some five million plus iPhone G3's this quarter. The quarter ends this September 30 and based on NPD Group info, Mr. Munster is expecting Apple to sell a record 2.8 million Mac's, 11 million iPod's in addition to those 5 million iPhone's. 


At one point it was being reported that Apple's Asian manufacturers were busy cranking out an astonishing 800,000 iPhone's per week! As Fortune's says, at that rate some investors were speculating that Apple may easily achieve their goal of selling some 10 million iPhones for fiscal 2008 as early as the end of this month. That's a pretty impressive figure indeed, but how will those figures be impacted by the likes of Nokia, LG, Samsung and all of the others as they copy, refine and improve their iPhone copy cats by adding better or even newer features that go beyond todays iPhone? Predicting future  iPhone  sales is tricky business at the very best and that goes especially considering the state of the U.S. and world economy. 


Apple, of course, didn't create the smart phone market, but they certainly have redefined it, and now, thanks to the iPhone, everyone in the business is bending over backwards to beat it's innovative lead that made it the best smart phone ever devised. Despite all of the iPhone's initial success, can the iPhone still retain it's lead? Can it be expected to continue to compete successfully against the likes of Nokia, Motorola, Samsung, LG, Phillips, etc.? I certainly believe so, but I also believe that if Apple wish's to remain the leader in the area of smart phone innovation they will have work hard, a lot harder, in fact,  by doing several key things, including, if necessary, copying it's competitors, as they themselves are yet copying the iPhone! This means, for me at least, that Apple has to improve on it's competitors in several key areas such as the following:


. improve the measely 2 mega pixel camera. For crying out toe nails', get with it Apple - some of your competitors are already featuring cameras with five and now eight mega pixels of photographic goodness. Not only are they offering higher rated sensors, but better optics as well!


 - keyboards. Yes, as cool as a touch screen keyboard is, it's still not enough for many of us out there. That's right Apple - it's time to get off your high horse and take into consideration that not only a few, but millions of people not only want - but absolutely insist on having a physical keyboard. Apple, at least as an option, should give people that choice. This is especially true for those in business. Apple's insistence that it's knows best isn't necessarily the best strategy for it to take.


 - App Store improvements. What do I mean? First and foremost, Apple has to stop this willy-nilly censoring of certain apps just because they feel it might be in direct competition with itself. If Apple is concerned about certain developers offering better apps than that of their own, well, then the only real and fair solution would be for Apple to compete by offering better choices themselves - not by limiting the choices offered by others! And that means that this willy-nilly censoring of developers and their apps has got to stop or those apps and their developers will be looking elsewhere at the first opportunity they get.


 -  AT&T exclusivity! Apple should, as soon as it can, unbind itself from being tied so exclusively to this one carrier. Dont' get me wrong, I don't want to see AT&T dropped, just the exclusivity that they now enjoy. More people would be enabled to enjoy all that the iPhone offers if other carriers had the opportunity to also sell the iPhone along side that of AT&T. By limiting the iPhone to just one carrier, Apple, at the same time, limits the iPhone's appeal and it's reach!


 - innovation and more of it, lots more of it. The iPhone clearly has become what it has because of it, and if Apple wish's to remain the king-of-the-hill in this regard, it will have to increase it's R&D budget even more than it is now. Innovation is the child of thinking different, thinking outside of the box and so far Apple has been exemplary in this regard, but it can't rest on it's laurel's, or you can bet your last gum drop that it's competitors will certainly increase their own innovation levels, and, if Apple isn't careful, turn their copies of the iPhone into something that is better than that of the original!


With competitor's equally as sharp as itself, such as Google and it's Android platform for instance, Apple will have it's work cut out if it wish's the iPhone to remain in the technical lead and the phone to beat. So, can Apple's iPhone continue to remain on top of the smart phone heap? Yes, of course, it's still possible, but Samsung, Phillip, Motorola, RIM and Google's Android, etc. are all worthy competitors whose continuing work brings their iPhone wannabe copy cats closer to the quality of that of the iPhone itself. 


Will the iPhone remain on top? Maybe? This, however, will only be true if Apple begins to shed some of it's arrogance and it faces up to the realities of what the customer actually wants - not simply just what Apple wants. That approach has and is still being deployed by a very large Redmond outfit and the results are plain for all to see - a user base so distraught over it's products that the company felt the need to recently spend $300 million dollars to try and convince them that they should love products that they have all grown to hate over the years!



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Monday, September 22, 2008.



Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!


 

   

Friday, September 19, 2008

The Strange, Strange World of Microsoft's Advertising!


Well, the strange, strange world of Microsoft advertising continues with the release of the first of the second wave of ads from Microsoft's massive $300 million dollar ad campaign. The whole point of this massive campaign is to improve Microsoft's image, by making it look COOL - just like Apple! However, if you ask me, from the looks of the first two 'Bill & Jerry' ads, to the now, 'I"m a PC' ads, Microsoft may end up looking more like a FOOL than a company who is COOL! The ads are a little better, showing, as they do, the wide range of different people who use Microsoft's pc software, but they are still rather strange in that they fail to point out how superior or cool Microsoft's products, especially Vista, really are in comparison with that of it's competition.


Mind you, according to Microsoft, the first two 'Bill & Jerry' ads were just teasers, mere warmer-uppers for the real ads that were officially released yesterday. And how did the new ,"I'm a PC, ad do? Well, as far as my 2 cents go on the matter - again, very strangely! That's right, as far as their intended purpose goes, that of improving Microsoft's image and that of Vista's very tarnished one, the ads missed their mark - BIG TIME! 


All-things Digital did a post titled, "New Microsoft Ads Win Most Improved Award (It Wasn't Hard Though)," but what's the point? The ads may deserve the award for 'most improved,' but they still don't do anything to really show, let alone prove, that Microsoft and it's tarnished VIsta OS, is worthy of anything that Microsoft has paid, big, big bucks for! I mean, come on, Microsoft, for your $300 million smack-a-roo's, don't you think that you can do better than that? I could buy a lot of socks and underwear for that kind of money!  However, I do agree, to a point, with All Things Digital when they say:


 "While the ads feel like they are tapping a little too much into that uneasy red-state-blue-state vibe–as if we need more of that–it’s also a nice job, thankfully, although not particularly new or innovative." 


Better yes, innovative no, and that's the point! I would have expected, no, demanded, that for the incredible sums being paid, that these ads should be a lot more than just innovative - they should also be down-right award winning, which they are certainly not! 


So far at least, these ads do nothing to convince anyone that Microsoft and it's products, especially Vista, is cool and innovative and worthy of our attention. In fact, even though the, "I'm a PC," ads may be true as to what people can do with Windows, it's also equally true for Mac users as well, something the ads should try to discourage. Microsoft, for example, may use several famous people in their ads, but guess what? Apple has legends of famous Mac users such as Robin Williams, Al Gore, former president Clinton, etc., which should make it easy for Apple to spin them around! For example, if Microsoft were to show a Windows user surfing the web, Apple could not only point out a Mac user doing the same, but doing it better, safer, and all without the need for a bunch of system sucking anti-spy programs running in the background! A good ad campaign should be able to refute it's competitor's without giving them a lot of ammo as these ads give Apple!


AppleInsider hit the nail on the head when they did a post titled, "Microsoft's $300 million ad campaign tumbles with new PC ads." As far as I'm concerned, Microsoft's new ads, thus far at least, are strange, very, very strange indeed and I can't understand for the life of me what Microsoft and it's agency, Crispine Porter & Bogusky were thinking when they thought up this lame excuse for a campaign? At first they presented nothing, absolutely nothing - no information what's-so-ever that would make me think of Microsoft or Vista being cool, let alone - desirable! The second wave gives us a little more information on the different kinds of Windows users, but it also, at the same time, gives Apple a lot of attention and ammo to fire back with later on!


In conclusion, even though some think that Apple's famous, "I'm a PC, I'm a Mac," campaign aren't as funny as they once were, but I like to point out, that the very lamest of Apple's ads are still, by far, head-and-shoulders, above anything that Microsoft's new campaign has yet produced. They very fact that Microsoft uses one of their own, 'John Hodgeman' look-a-likes, makes it seems that they are just trying desperately to keep up with the Jones's, or in this case, Apple!  In a sense, the new Microsoft ads are almost Mac ads, because they allude to it, something that they surely wouldn't have  done if the Mac was a lemon - a lemon like the new Microsoft ads!



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Friday, September 19, 2008.



Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!


 

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Did Microsoft Fire Jerry Senfeld?

If, like many other people, you didn't happen to think that Microsoft's, Bill and Jerry, comedy routine was very funny  - good news, because after a much controversial two weeks, the ad duo is no more. 


Despite denials from Microsoft, they have apparently fired the aging comedian from being apart of their new and massive $300,000,000 dollar 'image improvement' ad campaign! 


Does that still mean Jerry Seinfeld gets his $10,000,000 fee? Well, your guess is as good as mine on that one.


Microsoft's spin on the whole matter, is that the whole thing was planned, it was supposed to be just the teaser for the real ads yet to come, all of which were designed to help build up a positive image for the much maligned corporation. If that's the case, then it's a rather strange thing indeed, because despite their claims to the contrary, those first two ads brought in far more scorn on Microsoft than anything else. Hardly what I call  a good start for a positive image makeover!


Crispin Porter & Bogusky, the ad agency behind Microsot's new campaign to build a more positive image for the Redmond giant, has been very successful in the past in reversing public opinion, however, whether this will be the case here is yet to be seen, but it seems to have started on a rather odd footing if you ask me. As they say, "past performance is no guarantee for future performance!"

Apparently, Microsoft and it's agency now favors a more direct approach by directly addressing Apple's famous, "I"m a PC, I'm a Mac" ad campaign, something that a lot of people thought they should have done in the first place, myself included.

The New York Times has reported that Microsoft's campaign will now feature a John Hodgeman look-a-like character to help redefine Apple's ubiquitous ads! Will it work? Hell if I know? But presumably 300 million dollars can buy you a lot of high-flying advertising talent these days and, for Microsoft's sake, you would certainly hope so, now wouldn't you? However, I'm not sure if that is going to work this time around, because Apple's own ad agency has proven itself to be on of the best and it should be able to easily and effectively spin around, Microsoft's counter spin, on Apple's original spin to Apple's advantage!

So, is Microsoft just toying with us, getting us all pumped up for the next faze of their massive campaign to improve it's image? Bnet, for one, sure seems to think so. They quote another site, Creative Beef (love the name)  who they think has perhaps has the best summation of the whole kerfluffle:  who says:

"What are they trying to do? Get us to buy Windows-based computers? We already do. In droves. Oh sure, there’s the Cult of Apple. But their numbers don’t even come close to Microsoft’s. Apple’s advertising IS better. But so what? There are tons of small companies that do great advertising. But you don’t see massive corporation ns freaking out about it. If a small chain of sandwich shops puts together an award winning print campaign, you don’t see Subway changing their whole marketing plan[…"

That for me brings up an interesting point:  if people are really so crazy about Windows, if Apple is so insignificant, then why in hell is Microsoft spending 300 million clams to inform us of something that we already know? The answer is simple: people may be buying Windows in droves, but they are still not happy campers because Vista still sucks! 

The reality, of course, is that Apple and it's famous ads are really making a difference. Microsoft may be bigger than Apple is now, but with current present projections that is not only about to change - it's already in the process of changing! Apple's share of the market is growing at a far greater rate than that of Windows! Windows is slowly, but surely, losing market share and mostly to OS X, and, to a lesser extent to Linux. It's that growing trend of dissatisfied Windows users that are beginning to jump from the Windows ship, to the good ship Apple, that is behind this paranoia on Microsoft's part, and hence it's massive $300,000,000 counter ad campaign! Microsoft may not be as clever as they would like us to believe, but their not stupid either. They clearly see the writing on the wall and they are desperately trying to erase what they are seeing and stop, in the process, both the Mac and Linux camps before they become unstoppable, something that may already be too late to do.

Whether or not they actually fired Jerry Seinfeld, or whether it really was all part of their strategy all along, really doesn't matter - what matters is whether or not Microsoft's new campaign will actually convince people that Microsoft and it's products are as cool as the campaign says they are? Big name actors and lot's of spin may be enough, but somehow I sincerely doubt it, because as long as Vista still sucks, because it's too slow, incompatible with other software (often even with Microsoft's own), it's too complicated, too confusing, or as long as the hardware requirements are so steep, etc., no amount of advertising will convince people, while they are staring at yet another blue screen of death, that Microsoft and it's half-baked products, Vista included, are as great or as cool as the commercials claim!



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Thursday, September 18, 2008.


Image via: The New York Times


UPDATE:  Gizmodo has reported that the Bill & Jerry comedy ad duo has NOT been canceled after all! You can read all the dirt HERE!


Pease vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!


 

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

USB Device Easily Allows PC"s to Install OS X!

The demand to enable OS X to run on regular pc's as demonstrated by tiny Psystar's determination to take on one of the Goliath's of tech, Apple, is apparently quite huge and well worth the effort on their part! 


And now, even before Psystar's battle with Apple is legally resolved, another OS X on PC solution provider, EFiX has announce that they are offering to enable anyone to install OS X on their pc, providing it has the right specs, as easily as apple pie. Mind you, as simple and easy as EFiX's solution is, it won't come exactly cheap.


As you can see by clicking on this YouTube video, Gizmodo ran EFiX's solution absolutely perfectly, without a single hitch! EFiX is now selling a $195 European device that consists of a USB dongle that they describe as the ultimate device for all of those people out there (millions I suspect) that dream of running the best OS ever written on their own regular pc's.


EFiX's claims that their device now bridges the gap between the pc and Mac world and it will allow you to install, from the original Apple disks, a copy of OS X that will run as smoothly and as easily as any genuine Mac would, and that it will even allow you to update your new system, via Apple's update panel, without any of the hassle's that other Hackintosh's have had to go through!


You can check out Gizmodo's review and the American EFiX site for yourself and decide if it's your thing or not, but the big question, in all of this, isn't really how easy it is to use, or how well it works as compared to other methods of getting OS X to run on non-Apple machines, but it's rather the legal and moral aspects of doing so and what Apple intends to do about it?


Apple could always take, with EFiX, the same legal route that they are taking with Psystar, but that is a long drawn out and expensive process indeed, but at this point Apple has been completely silent regarding EFiX. How long that remain is yet to be seen.


However, what if Psystar were to actually win their case against Apple and any subsequent appeals? Well, then clearly the cat would be out of the bag and Apple, I feel, simply would have no other choice but to license their OS. This would also kill off Psystar and EFiX, because, at the same time, they would probably not have a hill-of-beans chance in competing with the likes of Dell, HP and every other manufacturer that would, most likely, also jump into the OS X business as a result.


One of the big problems of licensing OS X is the fact that Apple would not be able to guarantee the same level of performance or quality control that they are now able to do with the Mac. Apple's quality control of both the hardware and the software is one of the main advantages of OS X running on Apple hardware. This could not be guaranteed so easily by competing Mac cloners and clearly, this would lessen OS X's appeal somewhat. In this respect, it is interesting to note that even Microsoft recognizes the benefit of Apple's approach of being able to tightly control both the software and hardware side of the Mac and why it is now planning to actively work closely with the major pc vendors to try and duplicate that on the Windows side as much as possible!


The one reason that I would really like to see Apple start licensing OS X, just as all of the big vendors have begged them to do, is because with the current dissatisfaction with all things Microsoft, it would allow Apple and it's excellent OS to immediately grab huge and immediate increases in market share. Currently, one of the big disadvantages of Windows dominance of the OS space is that it has allowed Microsoft to basically get away with what ever they wanted to, like producing shoddy coding that has left millions of customers frustrated and angry. 


Of course, the other really big concerned for Apple is what licensing might end up doing to Apple's own hardware sales. Would it kill off the Mac as we know it? Would OS X become more like that of Windows, plagued as it is with scores of different hardware inconsistencies'? I, for one, think that scenario would be a tragedy, as it could discourage Apple from even building future Mac hardware altogether, and thus, one of OS X's biggest advantages, that of it's tight hardware and software integration would be lost, not to mention the inspiring hardware designs that Apple is so famous for.


Even though licensing OS X would be the best thing ever in thwarting Windows decades old dominance of the market place, If it means expanding OS X's market share by diluting the quality of the OS itself, or if it seriously threatens to hurt or kill off Apple's inspiring hardware business, then Apple should and must take all steps in stopping the likes of Psystar, EFIX and others from ever getting into the OS X ring!




And that's my 2 cents 4 this Wednesday, September 17, 2008.


Image of EFIX device: EFiX


Please vote for this post by clicking the fire button. Thanks!