Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The Big Winner At the 2009 Engadget Awards: Apple


Yesterday, the extremely popular site Engadget gave out their Engadget Awards for 2008 and Apple came out the big winner - winning in eight out of the 22 categories!

Wining eight of the categories is amazing, especially considering that Apple wasn't included in many of the categories, such as televisions, camera's, gaming consoles and tablet pc's, etc. Possibly, if they were, then who knows, maybe they would have would won even more awards than they already had?

Getting back to 2008, Apple took home awards in the People's Choice section for the following categories:

- Gadget of the Year - the iPhone

- Smartphone of the Year - the iPhone

- Desktop of the Year - the iMac

- Laptop of the Year - the Unibody MacBook Pro

- Display of the Year - the 24-inch LED Cinema Display

- Handheld of the Year - the iPod Touch

- Portable Media Device of the Year - the iPod Touch

- Storage Device or Technology of the Year - Apple's Time Capsule

Well, the people have spoken and they have spoken loudly. Interestingly, Microsoft's iPod killer, the Zune, also won an award - the Worst Gadget of the Year Award! Seriously, the Zune isn't a bad device. It's software is actually very elegant, but still, it's just not quite an iPod. Talk about rubbing salt in your wounds!

However, when it came to the Engadget Editor's Awards section, well, I'm afraid Apple didn't fair quite as well as it did in the People's Choice section. Apple won virtually all of the same categories here as they did in the People's Choice section, but, however, minus one - for the Desktop of the Year, which went to Dell's excellent Studio Hybrid. Nice little machine, mind you, but, personally, I still prefer the iMac, because, it's just a sexier machine, with much better software overall. Again, this isn't putting down the Dell Studio line in anyway, because it is a very fine line indeed.

Well, what can I say? It's been another year and another fine Apple crop of awards! What will next year bring? Who knows? One thing is for sure, it will be a lot harder for Apple in the coming years to win, and that's for the simple reason that everybody, and I mean everybody, from big old Microsoft, Dell, Nokia, Palm and who have you, have been seemingly aping Apple's design philosophy these days, and producing, as a result, better and better products. From OS software development, to applications, to computer hardware design, to mobiles, everybody and their their dog have being copying and mimicking, to one degree or another, all of Apple's past moves, making it much harder for Apple to win in the future - unless, or until, that is, Apple can continue to keep on out innovating them as they have been famous for?

Fortunately, Apple's awards are for products that have helped, in part, to inspired much better product design from it's competitor's. These have helped to indirectly inspire products such as the highly praised Windows 7, the equally praised Palm Pre and open source 3D OS desktop software like Compliz.

Hopefully, come this time next year, Apple will not only win just as many awards as this year, but even more awards as it enters new product categories that, again hopefully, will be equal or even better than the ones that have come before.

Congratulations to Apple and to all of the products that they have helped to inspire and improve upon. That means, in the end, that the real winners are we, the consumers, be it Apple consumers or those of it's competitor's!


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Tuesday, March 31, 2009


Monday, March 30, 2009

A Mac NetBook Spy Shot: You Decide!


There has been oodles of talk recently about the possibility of Apple releasing it's own version for a netbook Mac, despite the fact that Apple has repetitively said it's not interested in producing one. However, they have also stated that they were watching the nascent market closely and that they had some really cool ideas for one, if and when ever they ever decided to enter the market.


As you can see above, someone in Russia has leaked a picture of what some are saying is a spy shot of the new and upcoming Mac Netbook! Could it really be a picture of a Mac Netbook, or is it, most likely, simply a fake? Well, fake or not, Jesus DIaz of Gizmodo anyway thinks that it's hot, the perfect netbook and that he desperately wants one, be it fake or not! I can't say that I blame him, because for one thing, it's certainly a sexy looking little thing, now isn't it?" It's also very Mac like, both in it's appearance and it's relatively high sticker price of $899 U.S. Dollars.


The specs for this sexy looking dwarf of a Mac are as follows:


• 10.4" WXGA display.
• 1280 x 768 pixel with LED backlighting.
• NVIDIA MCP79
• Intel Atom Z740 1.83GHz with 1MB L2 cache.
• 2GB DDR3-800.
• NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
• 64GB Solid State Drive.
• Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR, Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n
• 1 x USB 2.0
• 1 x Mini Display Port
• Battery Li-Ion 5100mA

Personally, even though it looks like something that Apple would create, I sincerely doubt if this is the real thing. It's just a little too far fetched, for my pee brain, to think that someone in the former U.S.S.R could somehow be able to sneak a glimpse of this thing before the American press, in Apple's own back yard, could. But then again, what do I know? Besides, that very un-English keyboard is a big give away? After all, something tells me that Apple would be working on developing English, French, Italian, Spanish and good old German keyboards long, long before they would ever do a Russian one - if that's even a Russian keyboard to begin with? Looking at the keys on this thing, it seems more alien than earthly.

Fake or not, this Russian pic certainly helps to further fuel the long and deep desires of many for an Apple netbook. I'm not too crazy about netbooks, because, frankly, they are just way too underpowered for my taste, and for a little more than the $899 price of this thing, I would think that many would much prefer to buy themselves a real Mac, a MacBook with a lot more power and features. Building a netbook and selling it at $899, when other netbooks are going for as little as $199, totally negates the main selling advantage of Apple producing a netbook - it's low, low, selling price!

So, is this a picture of an upcoming Mac netbook?

Probably not.

But, still, none-the-less, it's a very interesting pic to say the least. At least it gives us some idea of just what an Apple might look like, and thus far, it's definitely, to my way of thinking, the best damn looking netbook that I have yet laid my eyes on! However, that said, whether or not Apple eventually ends up producing a netbook, or a tablet pc, for that matter, I really can't say. All I know for sure is that people are convinced that Apple is up to something - and something other than just your regular type of computing gizmo. I just don't know when or what that might entail, except to say that whatever it is, I would bet that it will be something that is really super different, super cool, super sexy, and super, duper expensive and, like many other geeks, I will super want one regardless of what it is, what it does, or whether I really need it or not!

Such is the magic of the uber-hyped Apple marketing machine.



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Monday, March 30, 2009


Mac NetBook pic via: Gizmodo

Friday, March 27, 2009

Is A Super iPhone Coming?

By all accounts, the next iPhone is not only coming soon, but it's beginning to look like it will be a real powerhouse - a Super iPhone if you will - a phone that could, in theory, just might kill off all of the other iPhone wannabe killer's in the process!


AppleInsider is reporting that Apple is now selling iPhones 3G's without a contract. The reason they explain:


"Apple's change in sales policy comes as the company is working to sell off remaining inventory to prepare for the upcoming launch of the new 2009 iPhone, expected to be released around the middle of June, possibly at the company's similarly-timed Worldwide Developer Conference".


In other words: a new iPhone is coming soon - very soon! The recent sneak-peak given by Apple on the next iPhone 3.0 software was exciting, but apparently what was presented was and is not all that we can expect to see in the next iPhone, or should i say - iPhone's? That's because Apple is believed to be readying not one, but two new iPhone models. We now know, for instance, that AT&T leaked that it was very, very excited about the next model of iPhone. The next iPhone, according to AT&T, will be a much, much better device and will offer an unparalleled experience across all of it's products and services.


AppleInsider is also reporting that the next iPhone could be offering a much greater level of security by incorporating either a hidden biometric reader or a built-in face recognition device, or even both. These could also be applied to Apple's future line of notebooks as well. However, as AppleInsider pointed out, just because Apple is actively working on such technology doesn't necessarily mean that it will be ready for deployment anytime soon, if ever.


So, what do I expect to see in the next iPhone or two?


One: A slimmed down and inexpensive model that will retail for $99 dollars or less. This iPhone will be for people who don't need, or don't want all of the extra features of the more capable and more expensive model. It will also cater to the economy and those who, because of their present financial circumstances, don't feel they that can afford the relative high costs of the present model.


Two: An honest-to-goodness iPhone business phone! Yes, this will be an iPhone that will be able to not only go head-to-toe with BlackBerry, Palm, Nokia, etc., both in it's features and in price, but in actuality, I expect that it will go far-and-beyond any of them, by providing superior features and price points that the other business smart phones simply won't be able to match.


One of these features will definitely finally include a model with a slide-out physical keyboard! Yes, even though Steve Jobs thinks that virtual keyboards are totally unnecessary, the fact remains that most people seem to think otherwise and as long as they do, it's in Apple's best interest to provide one, or otherwise Apple's competitor's certainly will and, in fact, are so doing! Also, in addition to the enhanced security of a possible biometric and face-recognition model, the next iPhone will definitely offer newer, faster and more powerful chip sets that will, in turn, provide the next iPhones with not only more advanced graphics (complete with OLED screens), but also with so much more processing power that we should start seeing much more advance apps that can compete with those on the desktop.


The built-in web cam, it's expected, will also be bumped up considerably far more than the 1.3 megapixels that we find today. I expect that it will hit a minimum of 5 megapixels, but more than likely it will reach upwards of 8 megapixels or more! Not only that, but finally Apple should be including the much wanted video recording capability as well.


In conclusion, can we expect a new so called "Super iPhone"? I believe that is exactly what we will see, and that this Super iPhone, I believe, could have just as much of an impact as that of the original iPhone did when it was introduced some barely two years ago! The next iPhone's could very well leave all of the other smart phones looking, well, more like dumb phones in comparison! I firmly believe that a Super iPhone is coming and one that will make other smart phones look down right pathetic! Apple will do this for the simple reason that they have no other choice! That's because Nokia, Samsung, Palm, etc. have been killing themselves in a mad rush to kill off the iPhone and they are getting good at it - really, really good. So good, in fact, that if Apple doesn't want them eating it's lunch, then they have to deliver an iPhone that goes way, way beyond either today's iPhone or that of it's competitors. For that reason alone, I'm predicting that Apple will do just that - introduce an iPhone - a Super iPhone, that will, in price and features, blow all of the other iPhone wannabe's clean out of the water, or at the very least back to their drawing table!


I can barely wait.



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Friday, March 27, 2009


Thursday, March 26, 2009

iPhone Game 4 the Day: Wolfeinstein 3D!



id' Software's Wolfenstein 3D, from 1992, is generally considered to be the very first real 3D first-person shooter game of all time, and the game that directly inspired and led to the development of the many sophisticated first-person shooter games that we find today.


I remembered that this was a game that my friend was totally and madly addicted to. He simply couldn't get enough of it, playing it none-stop for hours on end and he touted it as one of the main reasons why the PC totally ruled over the Mac. Well, I remember too, that I eventually got a Mac version of Wolfenstein that totally put the PC version to shame with it's much superior graphics, and even though I was never really addicted to it, as was he, I can still fondly remember spending many happy hours while playing it on my old Classic OS Mac's.


I was very happy to recently discover, however, that if your a iPhone or iPod Touch user, that for a mere $4.99, you can now relive all of those glory days via the AppStore. That's because id Software has just released all six of the original versions of Wolfenstein, featuring some 60 levels of heart-stomping fun and excitement for the iPhone/Touch! I currently don't own an iPhone, but I am definitely considering buying the next version and when and if I do, I definitely will also be buying Wolfenstein along with it, and that's one thing for sure!


No, this game doesn't offer the sophistication of today's first-person shooters, but heck.... it's still a hell of a lot of fun and it's a part of computer gaming history! It's worth the price for the nostalgia value alone. As you can see, from the YouTube video, Wolfenstein 3D on the iPhone/Touch looks and plays great, and as good as, if not better than the original PC and Mac versions themselves. Not only does the iPhone/Touch version faithfully reproduce the original look and play, but thanks to the newest version.... you can put it in your pocket and play it any old time and any old place that you please.


So, in conclusion, if you remember and enjoyed playing this grand daddy of all PC first-person shooters then rejoice, because you can now relive all of the fun and excitement of this great classic, again and again, any old time and place that you want. I know that I, for one, certainly will.




And that's my 2 cents 4 this Thursday, March 26, 2009


Wolfenstein 3D poster via: Wikipedia


Wednesday, March 25, 2009

OS X: Is It Really Secure or Not?




We all knew the day would eventually come, the day that the Mac was specifically targeted by all of the nasty scum out there on the net. According to some, that day has finally arrived and several websites are reporting on a new trojan that targets both Mac and Window users alike.


This particular trojan is a newer version of a piece of malware known as the OSX/RSPlug, and it was found by the Sophos security firm (see Vimeo video above), who's spokesperson Graham Cluely stated:


""There is much less malware for the Apple Mac than there is for Windows, but that doesn't mean that Apple fans can hide their head in the sand like ostriches."


Well, duh! This is clearly a case where the biggest problem isn't the computer or it's operating system, nor even it's browser. No, this is a plain case of stupidity on the part of the computer operator. The main victims, of course, being the inexperienced users out there, users who innocently assume that everyone out there is as honest and as law abiding as they.


The question arises, however: is the Mac as secure as Apple would have us believe, or is it, as others would have us believe, just as insecure or even worse than Windows?


As far as being insecure, as the later would tell us? Not a chance, not by a long shot, but it certainly highlights the fact that everyone who access's the net these days, be they Window users, Linux users or Mac users, has the duty to be constantly vigilant and on the lookout each and every time they go online. Most of the billions of web pages out there are totally innocent, as are it's users, but the plain fact still remains - you only need one website that has a nasty piece of code in it to do inestimable damage to your computer security and your well being if your not vigilant as you should and must be!


The fact remains, that ever since the first beta version of OS X was released in 2000, there there yet remains little if any reported cases of a Mac OS X computer being seriously compromised by any known virus or trojan! That's quite remarkable, and especially when you consider the fact that all of the handful of known viruses and trojans out there for OS X have, for the most part, been nothing more than just proof of concepts that have been confined and limited to the lab and have posed little or any real threat to actual users in the wild!


A lot of people would love for you to believe that OS X is just as prone to security issue's as is Windows, but don't believe them for a second. The idea that Mac's have "security due to obscurity" is an outrage, plain and simple. The idea that there are just not enough OS X users to make it a worthwhile target for all the crooks out there makes just about as much sense as someone saying that since the state of California only has about 10% of the American population, that it too is not worth crooks bothering to target it as well! With some 30 million or more Mac users out there, users that are generally better educated and earn more money than their PC counterparts, I would tend to think, if I were a producer of such malware, that Mac OS X would be one of the most tempting targets of all! If that's the case, then such logic would also suggest that if you live in a sparsely populated state, such as Vermont for example, then surely you wouldn't have a thing to worry about at all, now would you? No, net criminals don't care who they target, where they are from, or on what platform they target them. All they care about is scamming them easily out of their money, and if it's true that the Mac was so easy to breach, as some say it is, well, why then isn't it that you don't hear more from such Mac victims?


The answer is simple: you don't hear of Mac victims, because, for the most part there are no such victims! And it's not because of obscurity either! It's because the Unix based OS X is as secure as any other OS, if not more so. Again, remember: internet scammers are not bias about who's money they scam, but rather on how easy and how much they can scam, be it from a Windows, Linux, Mac or other users! Greed knows no boundaries after all.


Recently, at this year's CanWest's Pwn2Own propaganda contest, Charley Miller boasted of cracking Safari in a mere 10 seconds, leading you to believe that OS X and Safari are indeed just the easiest thing to exploit. But really, is that the case? Well, again, if that's the case, as he proudly claims, wouldn't you think that those 30 million plus and very affluent Mac users would have already noticed and reported that they were being scammed by now? I would, but since that's not the case I have a very hard time believing anything that comes out of this largely Microsoft sponsored propaganda rubbish event!


In fact, as InMuscatine.com points out this whole affair is deeply suspect. The problem, as they see it and plainly state:


"This is the problem we have been harping on since Pwn2Own started - that being that anyone with physical access to a computer can “pwn” it with practically no skill. In fact, here is the “rule” about physical access :


Each laptop will only have a direct wired connection (exposed through a crossover cable) and only one person may attack each system at a time so that each team’s exploit remains private.

We have called for a real test of a “hacker” to be zero physical access, the Mac computer located in another city behind a standard Cable/DSL router, and the “hacker” is supplied only an IP address. There will be no “social engineering” (read: exploiting stupid people), just a brute-force takeover of the computer by any software the “hacker” can write or choose to use.

If you do not like that, then is there someone explain why the “rules” of Pwn2Own expressly forbid remote exploits? Seriously, you cannot claim the prize money if you can remotely hack the machine - the “rules” expressly state you must physically be present at CanSecWest.

We suspect the reason for this “rule” is every “hacker” would fall flat on their faces were they to attack a PC to which they didn’t have physical access and was protected by a standard firewall in a Cable/DSL router. Well, at least if that computer is a Mac."

Yes, there you have it, and yes, even though some would have us believe that Mac and Safari can be easily and remotely compromised, this clearly is not the case. The truth is, that in order to achieve what they did they had to first have had physical access to a tethered machine - it was not remotely exploited at all! Ask yourself, how likely would you allow some stranger to have physical access to your home and computer? I thought so, not bloody well likely! Neither is it bloody well likely that your Mac is going to be easily and remotely compromised either. Trust me, Mr. Miller didn't just sit down and out then, of the blue, find a security breech, then figure out how to take advantage of it and then actually exploit it in a mere ten seconds! I find it an insult that anyone would think that we are dumb enough to believe such a foolish thing. Not even the fastest typist can type out a simple sentence in a mere ten seconds, let alone do what Mr. Miller is assumed to have done! No, Mr. Miller admitted that he discovered the Safari venerability a whole year ago, he just executed it in a mere ten seconds! I bet you my very last Tootsie Roll that Mr. Miller spent a lot longer trying to find that insecurity in Safari than in a mere ten seconds as well.

So, is the Mac really as insecure as some would have you to believe? The answer is a resounding NO! But, on the other hand, like every other OS and browser, neither is OS X or Safari fail proof! The truth is that OS X, despite all the nay sayers, is still one of the most secure OS's out there and it will multiply that security by a factor of ten with the arrival of Snow Leopard, which will incorporate considerable sand-bagging throughout it's architecture.

So, in conclusion, even though OS X is still a very secure OS, it's certainly, by no means, on the other hand, an excuse for stupidity on one's part, or for one to simply and carelessly assume that hey are safe and let their guard down either. No matter how secure an OS or a browser is, the onus is still on each and every one of us to be as vigilant and on guard as we can. Social engineering is a very real threat, and it comes with very real and painful consequences if we fail to take the approbate action on our part of being ever so suspicious, watchful and vigilant as we can be.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Wednesday, March 25, 2009


Tuesday, March 24, 2009

An Old Mac vs A Modern PC!


Today's post, my 500th., will be a short look at an old Mac Classic II vs a newer Intel Core Duo Vista machine. As you can see from the above YouTube video, these two computers, the ancient Mac (1987 model) vs a sleek and modern Toshiba laptop ( 2007 model), are pitted in a "zero to sixty" speed test. The old Mac is running ancient and venerable Mac Classic OS (most likely version 8.5), where as the newer Toshiba is running Microsoft's latest and greatest, Vista!


The goal of the test is simple: to have the two computers go from a cold boot-up, then open and close a Microsoft Word doc , then finally shut completely down again. So, how does the ancient Mac classic, with it's measly two megabytes of RAM and a pokey 16 megahertz CPU, fare against a modern and sleek Toshiba laptop with it's gigabyte of RAM, Intel Pentium Dual processor, Vista and a modern version of Microsoft Word? Just how badly does the newer Toshiba trounce the old Mac?


Well, the video speaks for itself as you can plainly see!


Obviously, it's only natural that you would expect that the old Mac wouldn't have a "snowball in hell" of a chance in beating the newer Vista equipped Toshiba. Still, however, after all the dust settles, the outcome of this little test surprisingly says a lot about the tenacity and strength of the 20 year old computer's hardware and the world's longest running GUI OS that powers it.


Way to go Mac!



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Tuesday, March 24, 2009


Monday, March 23, 2009

A Mac for the Recession: The 17" Educational iMac


Apparently, the death of the 17" inch iMac has been grossly overestimated. It seems that the global economic meltdown has prompted Apple to help out cash-strapped educational budgets by offering them an "education only" 17" model of the iMac for $899.


Apple's last all-in-one educational computer, the eMac, was discontinued in 2006. The eMac, also featured a 17" built-in screen and originally was intended to be sold only to the educational market. However, barely a month after it's release, due to great public interest and demand, Apple also released this "education only" Mac for sale to the general public. The question naturally arises: could history repeat itself? Could Apple be pressured to release the 17" educational iMac to the general public as it did with the eMac? After all, the educational markets are not the only ones who have been hit hard during these trying economic times. A lot of people are just as cash-strapped and are looking for cheaper and additional options other then Apple's high-end offerings. At these lower educational prices, this educational iMac could teach Apple a lesson in pricing, and would seem to be just the ticket that Apple needs to help boost it's recently declining desktop sales.


Of course, the other really big question would be how such a lower priced, lower spec iMac would directly impact the sales of Apple's newly upgraded Mac Mini, who's prices start at $599 and $799 respectively? Both of these starting price points don't include any keyboard, mouse or monitor, so for a lot of people that extra $100 would make the 17" iMac a much better deal. After factoring in the price of a new keyboard and monitor, then you could be looking at paying considerably more for the Mini, unless and, of course, that is you have a spare monitor, mouse and keyboard already laying around the place.


I have to admit, even though a 17" seems rather boring when compared to either the current 20 and 24" iMac models, it's low, low $899 price point seems awfully tempting, and that's especially a lot more so during this bitterly hard recession! I haven't read much about the 17" iMac's specs, other than it having a keyboard and that 17"inch screen, but I would imagine that it spec's would be comparable to that of the Mini's which feature 120 and 320 GB hard drives, integrated graphics and 1 and 2GB or RAM. Those specs are nothing especially exciting, but for your basic daily needs of surfing the net, word-processing, simple games and enjoying music and video, then the 17" inch iMac is probably all that you really need.


Personally, I've still have my heart set on a 24" quad-core i7 iMac, which I was very disappointed didn't make the last upgrade cycle as previously expected. However, there are hints that, after Snow Leopard pounces sometime later this year, I and many others will finally be getting our wish. I hope so anyway, but in the meantime, especially because of the harsh economic realities of today's recession, I'm hoping that Apple will seriously consider doing what it did previously with it's eMac "educational only" computer and offer the 17" educational iMac to the general public at large. That in, my mind ,would not only help replace a lot of the recent decline in Apple's desktop line, but at the same time, it hopefully would also help to increase the Mac's overall market share by making the iMac a lot more palatable to the pocket books of a recession weary public.




And that's my 2 cents 4 this, March 23, 2009


Apple educational marketing image via: AppleInsider


UPDATE: Arstecnica says that the educational model consists of the old white plastic casing and features a 1.83 GHZ Duo Intel chip.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Steve Ballmer: Buffoon or Genius?

Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's CEO is at it again and harping on Apple yet once more by saying that Apple's customers pay far too high a price for admission, namely $500 just for the privilege of having the Apple logo on their gear! He told Stephen Adler, the editor-in-chief of BusinessWeek that, "“Paying $500 more to get a logo on it, I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average consumer.”


The WallStreetJournal.com describes Mr. Ballmer as, being "his typically wacky and freewheeling self at the McGraw-Hill media summit Thursday," where he "directed some tough talk at Apple, IBM and even himself."


The WallStreetJournal went on to say:


"He admitted that he doesn't own any Apple products, nor do his wife or children. (Perhaps a reference to the recent Vogue interview in which Melinda Gates said that she was desperate for an iPhone, but Bill wouldn't allow it.) And Mr. Ballmer doesn't think much about the appeal of Apple's typically premium-Priced products during the recession."


Well, what can you say? Mr. Ballmer is, well, Mr. Ballmer, but the question in some minds might be:


"Is he a buffoon or is he a genius?"


Well, he's certainly a colorful and engaging kind of guy that's for sure. He's also rich (oh, boy, is he rich!), he's powerful and he rules with an iron fist one of the world's most powerful and influential companies in history. That said, all of that doesn't make him automatically right about Apple or anything else. Personally, as much as I love the guy and enjoy listening to him, I take almost everything he says with a grain of salt. No, make that a barrel full of salt. He's almost, to some, like a big, clumsy comedian considering the famous ways he's been known to jump up and down and shriek on stage as can be seen in this YouTube video seen below.





And, as you can see below, some people even like to poke fun at the fact that Steve tends to repeat himself a wee bit at times!








If anything, Steve is obviously one hell of a great salesman. After all, under his direction and that of Uncle Bill, Windows went on to become the biggest selling operating system of all time! Whether it is the best OS of all time, well, in respect for Steve I won't go there.



Going back to Apple, Steve can't be expected to simply come out and say something like, " Apple products are great - way better than ours! I wish we could create great original products like that, but since we can't - we'll just keep on copying and ripping them off and tell everyone that we did it first!" No, he certainly can't be expected to say things like that. Steve has to be very careful concerning Apple and what he says about it, but that, on the other hand, doesn't stop him from having a little fun by laughing and running the company down as he did with the iPhone seen below:





Just as some people like to think that Mr. Ballmer makes stupid remarks , others still love to 'egg around' with him as you can see below, and while others just love to make a game out of him .





Steve Ballmer on Steve Jobs, says in the following YouTube clip:





Steve Jobs on Steve Ballmer and Microsoft, says the following:






I say on Steve Ballmer, that even though I don't agree with much of anything that he actually says, at least about Apple, I still have to admit, that in addition to being a very colorful person, he is also a very interesting and amusing person. Even though the guy is obviously very educated and very intelligent, his antics at times are so comical, as in those viral videos above, that he could probably and very easily make yet another fortune as a professional stand-up comedian. Whether you hate him, or you love him, he's one guy that you can't quite ever get enough of!


But is he a buffoon? No, not really, not by a long shot. Is he a genius? Maybe, but I'm not sure of that one, but after it's all said and done, he's sure is one hell of a colorful and interesting fellow if ever there was one!



My hat off to the guy!




And that's my 2 cents 4 this Friday, March 20, 2009


Mr. Ballmer's official portrait via: Microsoft

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Apple NetBook Confirmed!


WOW! According to Smarthouse.com it's TRUE! - Apple has been confirmed, by electronic giant LG, that Apple will be coming out with an OLED based netbook and new OLED iPhones!



LG should know, because they and Apple have already signed a multibillion dollar contract, and one that saw Apple pay LG a cool half-billion dollars upfront to cement! LG would be supplying all of the OLED screens, so if anyone was in the position to know, other than Apple, it would be them.



One source has even told Smarthouse that Apple already has a working prototype, with an OLED screen that that had the ability to eliminate the greasy finger streaks that are normally associated with other OLED screens! In addition, Smarthouse even claimed that Apple is even looking at using wafer thin OLEDs that would be used to link to a wireless Apple TV like box, though no other information was forthcoming on exactly what that might be.



If true, this is exciting news that should have all of the other netbook manufacturers trembling in their shoes! Apple may not always necessarily be the first in the technological ring, but once they do enter, they usually end up delivering a knock-out blow to their adversaries. They did it with the iPod, and now they have done it with the iPhone and the AppStore, so could it be possible that they will do it again with the netbook?



Apple has repetitively said that they weren't interested in the nascent netbook market, but they did have some interesting ideas for one, but for the most part they were only watching and studying it. Of course, that''s what they said about using Intel processors, or adding video to the iPod and we all know how those two turned out. Generally speaking, I have learned that if Apples says that they are not interested in something, then mostly assuredly they really are. Yes, Steve Jobs may have stated that Apple doesn't know how to make anything for $500 that wasn't a piece of junk, but then again, what about the higher end netbooks? They can easily fetch prices of up to $800 or more and that, frankly, isn't that far off from the price of the entry MacBook!



Considering that Apple's desktop and laptop sales have been recently off by some 16%, while PC sales have been up (thanks mostly to those cheap netbooks), Apple may feel that they have no real choice, in this recession, but to enter the netbook market. The question is: just what can we expect to see from an Apple designed netbook?



First off, Apple being the fashion consensus entity that it is, we can probably expect a looker - a machine that is beautiful to look at - a virtual piece of "unibody" sculptured art! It will be equally simple to use and, again, Apple being Apple, it will cost an arm and a leg! But it will be worth it, in the end, I believe, because it should offer far more than what we now presently see in the PC netbook space. Certainly, in some ways, it will depart from the traditional concepts we now see with all of the netbooks that have come thus far. Apple believes in thinking differently and that is why it's products, in various ways, are different and unique from anything else in their class. Expect the same for any Apple netbook.



Secondarily, it's obvious , that any such netbook will be running OS X. Currently, OS X runs light, it runs fast and it runs very efficiently on both the iPhone and iPod Touch and I expect to see as much on the netbook side. Like both of those iconic devices, OS X may be trimmed of a lot of unnecessary fat found on the desktop side, since it will, no doubt, also be running on Apple's upcoming OS X Snow Leopard, a much more secure, powerful, faster and leaner OS to begin with. In other words, don't expect to see any MacNetBook released any time before the release of Snow Leopard itself! Hopefully, that may be as early as June, so too, likely will be any release of an Apple netbook.



Normally, I'm not too crazy about netbooks, but having seen hackintosh versions running on various PC netbooks, such as the one picture at the beginning of this post, I have to admit, I have played around with the idea of buying a PC netbook from MSI or Dell and hacking it myself, and that despite the fact that I"m both lazy and totally inept at such things. Having a more expensive, but much more usable and featured packed Apple produced netbook, however, is a far more favorable solution. Providing, that is, it's not too expensive.



Even though, at the moment, OLEDs are rather expensive to produce, as ElectricPig brings out, I don't believe that will remain the case for much longer. Technology doesn't sit still and I can only hope that both Apple and LG have something up their sleeve that will result in them being able to market them at reasonable costs, because if they can, there isn't going to be any netbook out there that will be able to compete with them at any price.




And that's my 2 cents 4 this Thursday, March 19, 2009


Hackintosh netbook photos via: Gizmodo

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The iPhone's OS 3.0 Beta: Can It Beat the Pre?

With some 100 plus new features, Apple's latest iPhone 3.0 beta should help make the world's most advanced mobile OS even a lot more advanced, but the question is: will it still be enough to take on the likes of the Pre and the rest of the competition?


It certainly will go a long way in giving the iPhone a lot of the features that many feel it should have had from the very beginning, including the most requested feature -- cut, copy and paste, but clearly the competition is starting to catch up and Apple will need to keep on it's toe's if it wish's to stay on top of the smart phone market.


The iPhone OS 3.0 beta, by virtue of it's over 1,000 new API's, should greatly help enable developers to write some fantastic new programs by using it's newest and more advanced features. Features such as: Shake to shuffle, Audio/Video tags, Notes Sync, YouTube subscriptions, Languages, VPN on demand, Parental controls, Auto-fill, Call log, Encrypted Profiles, Stereo Bluetooth, iTunes account creation and new Anti-phising, among others Hopefully, the new beta will result in some of these developers releasing new apps that takes advantages of these features by the time OS 3.0 is officially released this summer?


More of these features, as listed by Engadget, include the following:


App and developer functionality (more here)

  • Peer-to-peer connectivity over Bluetooth for gaming and other info-swapping.
  • Paid apps will have the potential to be subscription fee-based, and can include optional paid content that can be bought from right inside the app.
  • Developers can now build apps that call out to Google Maps, and can also finally bring Apple-blessed turn-by-turn to the phone.
  • Devs can also connect with hardware accessories over in their apps now, such as a blood pressure monitor -- or perhaps a keyboard? Connectivity works through the dock connector or over Bluetooth.
  • Long-promised push functionality will at last be included, but apps won't run in the background.
  • Developers can add streaming video and audio to their apps, along with in-game voice use.

General functionality

  • Cut, copy and paste. At last! You can shake the phone to undo and redo the action, and it works with both text and photos, allowing Mail to send multiple photos at a time. (more here)
  • MMS, along with forward and delete for multiple messages. (more here)
  • A2DP stereo Bluetooth.
  • Unlocked Bluetooth functionality on 2G iPod touch. (more here)
  • Spotlight has been added to a new home screen page to the left of existing pages, allowing for universal search on the phone. (more here)
  • Tethering is built into 3.0, and Apple will work with carriers on that -- who will have the last say on its implementation, most likely.
  • App Store will be available in 77 countries.
  • Parental controls for TV shows, movies and App Store apps.
  • Auto-login for WiFi hotspots.

Apple apps

  • A new app called Voice Memos which lets you record notes and reminders.
  • A revised Stocks app, with news stories and a landscape view.
  • Landscape view available for Mail, Text and Notes.
  • CalDAV support has been added to Calendar, along with subscriptions support in the .ics format.
  • Apple's major apps have all been expanded with search functionality.
  • Note syncing to Mac and PC.
  • YouTube account support.
  • Form auto-fill.
  • Phishing protection.
  • Shake the shuffle iPod playback.


Well, all-in-all, I feel that the new beta software certainly shows a lot of promise, but the big question is: will it be enough to fend off the competition, which has taken a lot of clues from the iPhone itself to build their own iPhone like devices, that in some cases actually surpass Apple's original in functionality, at least in certain specific areas? The biggest challenger yet, and one that has dared to directly challenge the iPhone's collection of multi-touch patents, is the new and highly praised Palm Pre.



I'm really, really curious as to what Apple will do once the Pre hits the streets - will it sue Palm for patent infringement? And secondarily, if it does - will it succeed? Palm, on it's part, seems to feel that it's on safe ground, but if that is indeed the case, then surely every other mobile OEM should also be free to copy every single iPhone multi-touch feature as well, thus eliminating not only any advantage for the iPhone, but for the Pre itself!



Of course, what the OS 3.0 event didn't reveal was any new iPhone hardware, or any glimpse of a possible Apple netbook or touch tablet. That didn't happen, but it's obvious that the new OS beta is one that holds a lot of promise of turning the iPhone into a much, much more serious contender as a business phone. I would think, that after watching the keynote (seen here), that Apple is going to match it's newest OS to newer and much more business friendly hardware. Will that include a slide-out physical keyboard? I don't know, but if they are smart (and I think that they are) they had better well consider it, at least as an add-on option! Frankly, it really doesn't matter what Apple wants or likes, but rather what matters is that Apple focus's on giving it's customers what it wants and likes, and clearly that, for most business users, is having a physical keyboard!



Apple has given us a glimpse of the future with it's OS 3.0 beta software, and that in turn, has given us a wee glimpse of the next iPhone itself, and one that I'm pretty certain should be more than able to take on the likes of the Pre and the rest of the competition? After all, the iPhone's biggest trump card - it's AppStore, is something that no one else, including the Pre, can't even begin to touch with their cheap copy cat app stores. I simply don't see how the Pre (which isn't capable of handling iPhone like games), or how anyone else is going to be able to snatch the smart phone crown from the iPhone, or by replacing it as the world's most innovative, most exciting, and the world's most desirable smart phone, anytime soon!



Someday, maybe? But not today!



And that's my 2 cents 4 this Wednesday, March 18, 2009



Tuesday, March 17, 2009

The iPhone: What Is Apple Cooking Up Next?


It's Tuesday, the 17 th. of March and it's the big day that Apple , in a few more hours, will not only release upon it's vast developer community a new SDK, but it's the day that Apple will finally give us a sneak peak at it's latest update to the iPhone's OS X based OS, version 3.0!


The tension is building and millions of tongues around the world are wagging, expressing their thoughts and their hopes of just what Uncle Steve and his gang will, or will not introduce at an event that could set the course for the entire industry for years to come. Besides the new OS, millions of people are also hoping that Apple will give us another of it's famous, "Just one more thing," moments. Just what that moment might entail, well, there are several interesting possibilities.


The first possibility is obvious: a new model of the iPhone that would go far and beyond the capabilities of the present model. In fact, over at MacObserver they are reporting that one analyst is now predicting that Apple may surprise us all with not one, but - two brand new iPhones! They would include a low cost, budget iPhone, retailing for around $99, and a higher end model that would come with as much as 32 GB or more of RAM. Oooh, just think how sweet that would be when running multiple apps in the background, if that capability is added as well!


A second possibility, of course, is that Apple may be ready to finally enter the ring of producing a netbook, those cheap, underpowered, but extremely popular devices that have been grabbing both considerable market share and the medias attention. I will admit that some of the netbooks that I have played with are sort of cool, and it would be interesting to see just what Apple's world famous design and innovative traits could add to this nascent market, but, for me, as cute as they are - that's all they are! They are simply too underpowered and under featured for my particular taste. I much rather pay a little more to get a lot more power from a traditional laptop such as the MacBook.


A third and very real possibility is that Apple is about to enter the computer tablet business as has been long predicted that it would eventually do. Slash Gear's Chris Davies thinks that maybe this just might even be the, "Oh, just one last thing" that some are looking for. Certainly, as you can see from the mock illustration above, the idea for a Mac Tablet is certainly an entertaining one at the very least. I like the idea of a sleek, sexy little contraption that would be inexpensive, but also powerful, fast and fun to use, and one that could run all of the thousands and thousands of apps from the AppStore, but only better because of it's larger multi touch screen, and, hopefully, it's much more powerful cpu and graphic chips? Telephony features along with WiFi and Blu-Tooth would really be the icing on the cake of what would be a very delicious device indeed.


Then again, Apple being Apple, well, we could all be in for a big surprise as it fielded something completely new, completely unexpected and completely straight out of left field - something that nobody ever would have imagined in a million years - a totally new category of device, or product that could blaze new paths never traveled before!


Whatever Jobs' and company delivers or doesn't deliever, we don't have to wait much longer, because in just a few more short hours we will finally know.


I just can't wait!


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Monday, March 16, 2009

Is This Proof of a New iPhone for June 2009?


Growing evidence suggests that a brand new iPhone is on the horizon. Proof, people say, can be found in the fact that tomorrow Apple will be giving iPhone developers access to a new and better SDK, and that it also will be giving the world a sneak peak at it's next iPhone OS, version 3.0. Could this be proof, and as some believed, the precursor for the next and third generation of the popular iPhone?


First, regarding the OS update, rumors are swirling that it will include some very long sought after capabilities, such as copy and paste, and that it will finally add multitasking to the mix that should keep the iPhone on a par with the upcoming Palm Pre, which is seen by some as eclipsing the iPhone in certain critical areas. Several sources are hinting at such extended capabilities, with some of the latest rumors coming from Kevin Rose from Digg fame. In the past, Kevin's predictions have met with mixed success, but, on the other hand, some of his various sources have given him several spectacular hits. Could this be one of them?


A Fortune blog is reporting that copy and paste on the iPhone, according to Keving Rose, will work as follows:


" 1. You double tap on a word (or, presumably, an insertion point)

2. A kind of magnifying glass appears with quote marks on either side of the selection

3. You drag the quote marks forward or back to surround the section you want to work with

4. You choose one of three buttons: Copy, Paste or Cut."



However, according to Rose and his sources, the newest iPhone Os will not include the following:


" • No background apps (”not this release”)

No video (”it’s a technical problem”)

No multimedia messaging service (MMS)"



Again, however, the really big news coming from tomorrow's live iPhone OS 3.0 event should be that it, hopefully, gives us a clear signal that a new and third iPhone is indeed just around the corner, and quite possibly as early as this June, barely two months away! Adding to this rumor is the fact that one U.K. iPhone provider has already announced that it will be giving the 8GB iPhone away for free, in preparation, many believe, to make way for the newer model.


Any newer model, it's believed, will feature newer and faster chips, as well as a new and faster Safari browser featuring it's new Nitro engine. This should help keep the iPhone ahead of the Pre's browser, which is built on Apple's WebKit, by the way. Some are claiming that the Pre's browser currently could be as much as 4x faster than Safari current version for the iPhone! Hopefully, though, that won't be the case for much longer.


Also, it's certainly possible that a new and improved user interface will be included in the new OS, and one that should help enable the iPhone to out-distance anything that any of Apple's competitor's have come up with thus far, such as the Palm Pre's U.I., which has charmed and wowed the critics thus far.


With a big Apple breathing down little Palm's neck with it's hoard of multi-touch patents, big bank account, and now, with the possibility of a more superior OS 3.0 and a new and superior iPhone hardware offering, I can only speculate that come tomorrow night, that Palm's stock price may be in for a beating! That certainly would serve Roger MaNamee right, since he's been bragging that the Pre is so superior to the iPhone that all of it's customers will eventully switch over to the Pre after their contracts expire. Pride goes before a fall, they say, so with all of his blatant anti iPhone talk and his braggadocio, as far as I'm concerned, it will serve him right to lose every single penny of the $100,000,000 that his firm has invested in Palm. Roger's anti-iPhone bashing has been so obnoxious that even Palm had to officially go out of it's way to distance itself from all of his shameless braggadocio and flamboyant exaggerations!


Whether or not Kevin Rose is right, or even someone like Roger McNammee is right, one thing is sure: we can't really be certain of anything until and after Apple spills-the-beans come tomorrow! We can speculate to the cows come home on just what Apple will announce, but until then, we can only guess and hope that we see what we want to see. Hopefully, what ever it is that Apple officially announces, it will blow our expectations away with some really new and completely unexpected cool features and ones that no one saw coming, just as they have done so many times in the past?


So, could the price cuts in the U.K. and Apple's iPhone 3.0 upcoming OS 3.0 announcment really be proof that a new iPhone is coming out soon? Well, there are lots of rumors out there, but my fingers are crossed as I, and millions of others, look forward to tomorrow's big iPhone event. Personally, even though I can't say for sure, deep down inside, I'm totally convinced that will be the case and that the next and greatest iPhone, version three, is not only around the bend, but, that it will wow and excite us just as much as did the first and second iPhone have, but we'll all just have to wait and see.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Monday, March 16, 2009


iPhone mock up via: APCMag.com

Friday, March 13, 2009

A Glimpse of the Future: The iPhone's Newest OS, Version 3.0


Apple has announced that it will give a glimpse of it's next iPhone OS, version 3.0, on the 17 th. of this month. In addition, it's also expected it will reveal a brand new version of the iPhone's SDK. But just what could the latest version include, and just what will this sneak peak possibly reveal about the future of the next iPhone itself?


Hopefully, it will mean that Apple will finally get around to adding something that it first introduced on the desktop scene a long, long time ago - cut and paste! It will finally be about time ! Whether that happens or not is just idle speculation, on my part, of course, but it sure would be nice if it did. Others are also hoping that it will mean the ability to run multiple programs simultaneously in the background, much like the Palm Pre.


CNet's Tom Krazit even brings up the possibility that the OS update might shed some more light on Apple's acquisition of P. A. Semi, a semiconductor firm and that Apple purchased last year and just what, if any, new and unique chips that it may have designed for the next iPhone? It is believed by some that P.A. Semi may have been working on chips that would extend the use, longevity and functionality of the device. That remains to be seen, however.


Also, Tom noted that Piper Jaffray's, Gene Munster, thinks that Apple may demonstrate a "universal search capability" as part of any new upgrade in version 3.0. As Tom points out, there is no real way to search for contents on the iPhone's home screen. Of course, as he also mentions, individual applications can have that feature, but the iPhone itself presently doesn't.


Tom asks his readers what they think the new OS upgrade might bring, and personally, if you ask me, that in addition to adding more push notifications, search features and cut and paste, and as well as being able to run multiple applications in the background, I personally feel that the most important thing that the new OS upgrade will bring is a glimpse of the next iPhone itself! Hopefully, the new software will give us a clearer view of the next iPhone, that will, hopefully, take it far and beyond anything that Apple's competitor's can ever hope to dream of. Yes, the next iPhone itself may not exactly be introduced on the 17th itself, but the very fact that the newest version of the iPhone's OS is just about ready, surely means that the next version of the iPhone is just around the corner too! How soon could we expect to see the latest iPhone hardware? I don't know, but maybe, as some have been speculating on for awhile now, as early as this June, if not even sooner.


Surely, if Apple's announces capabilities in the new OS that go's beyond the hardware capability of today's iPhone, then we should clearly be able to get a glimpse of a future iPhone who's software and hardware will virtually blow every and all other smart phones completely out of the water! I would almost bet that will indeed be the case at Tuesday's unveiling. At least I hope so, anyway.


I'm convinced that the iPhone's newest OS is not only a dead give away that the third generation of iPhone hardware is just around the corner, but also that this means that the iPhone hardware will be getting things such as a much higher resolution camera, and maybe two of them, one in back and one in the front for video chat and video conferencing? Hopefully, too this will shed light that the next hardware upgrade will also include some sort of Haptic like feedback. And, yes, maybe even, at least as an option, a hint that a physical keyboard will be available for those folk who want it?


The 17th of March will not only be a sneak peak of what the latest iPhone software will do, but also a glimpse of just the iPhone itself will be able in the future to do, and that my friends, will be definitely a lot more than it can do now. And who knows, maybe Apple will, in a surprise move, actually introduce the next iPhone at the same time they introduce the new OS? I doubt it, but a guy can always dream, can't he?


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Friday, March 13, 2009

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Dell's Latest iMac Killer - The Studio 19 One


Of all the iMac inspired PC's, the Dell XPS One was the most original and the best looking of the bunch. All of the others, be they from Gateway, Averatec, etc., they all seemed to be nothing more than a black version of the iMac.


Now Dell has done it again and introduced it's newest all-in-one PC, the Studio 19 One. Presently, Dell is targeting it mostly for the space-conscience Japanese market, but don't worry, it will be coming state-side sometime this spring.


All-in-all, this all-in-one, is a stunningly beautiful machine to look at. In fact, I dare say that it's even a tad bit better looking than the aluminum iMac from which it was inspired! As you can see, in the above photo, via Electronista.com and of those below, this gorgeous work of art is also customizable. That's because it allows you the option of choosing, or switching between several colors like red, black, or white! A nice touch.

Another nice touch is the fact that it ups the iMac by including desktop versions of various Intel chips, from a single-core Celeron, Penitium dual-core, Core 2 Duo, or Core 2 Quad chips, compared to the iMac which only uses the mobile version of Intel's Core Duo 2. The machine is smaller than the low-end iMac with it's 20 inch screen. The new Studio One 19 screen is only 18.5 inch's and comes with a resolution of 1366x768, including a ratio of 16:9. This fine looking machine also comes with Dell's promise of better-than-average integrated video performance, from either it's GeForce 9200 or GeForce 9400. This should give the Studio One 19 the power to decode HD video and to put up with it's biggest draw back - Vista!


In addition to the above, the Studio One 19 can handle up to 4GB of RAM, versus' the iMac's max of 8GB. It can also be had with up to a 750GB hard drive, a built-in webcam, Wi-Fi, or a Blu-ray drive.


Over all, this is a machine, that even though it wont' give power users anything to cheer about, should be more than easily capable of handling the average user basic needs of surfing the net, watching video or handling their photos and music. High-end game lovers will need to look elsewhere, however.


The biggest selling feature of this machine, as has been the case historically with Dell's offerings, is it's low, low prices! This starts as low as a measly $699 U.S. for the base model. Compared to a Mac Mini, which has no monitor, keyboard or even a mouse, this will appeal to a lot of people despite it's disadvantages. It's biggest disadvantage, however, namely Vista, may not even be that big of a deal if and when Microsoft ever rolls out it's replacement, Vista 2, or as they now call it - Windows 7. Even though Windows 7 isn't as cool as Leopard, let alone it's soon up-coming replacement, Snow Leopard, it will still be the best attempt on Microsoft's part of aping Apple's superior OS! As a result, with the inclusion of Windows 7, the new Dell Studio 19 One is a machine that even a Mac lover, like myself, would be tempted to buy and enjoy. I'm quite please with it, to be quite honest, but, however, that is based only on what I have read, not on what I have yet to experience hands on. Hopefully, I will get the opportunity to do so sometime this spring.



Of course, after upgrading the Studio 19 One with it's better and more costly components, I would expect that this machine's eventual price will be more in line with and a lot closer to that of the basic 20 inch iMac. In that case, I think it will still remain inferior to the basic iMac, and that's even with Microsoft's excellent new OS, Windows 7, on board! Still, after it's all said and done, I have to give Dell an A for trying. They have been taking, like Microsoft and everyone else it seems, a lot of clues from Apple and it's really starting to show up in the ever more bold and exciting designs, such as the Adamo and Studio 19 One.


Would I ever be tempted to buy one of these machines? Absolutely, but certainly not as my primary machine. That will remain, for many reasons, to be the Mac. The Mac, of course, is more than just great hardware - it's the total experience of great software and how well it integrates with it's hardware, that really makes a Mac a Mac!


So, is the Dell Studio 19 One an iMac killer?


No, but it's pretty close! A nice little machine it is, a damn nice machine! Way to go Dell!


However, even with it's low, low starting price of only $699, and it's combination of great looks and the prospect of Windows 7, well, this is a great machine, but it's still no iMac killer. Still, however, I can't deny that Dell's new Studio 19 One is anything less than a sexy little beast. In the back of my mind, however, I just can't help but wonder about how much nicer, or how much cooler this machine would and could be, if only Apple would license it to run Snow Leopard.


Schade, I say - that's too bad.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Thursday, March 12, 2009

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Mysterious Netbook, Super iPod, iPhone: Just What Is Apple Up To?



Just what on earth is Apple up to? Certainly, if you go by all of the recent press, it is either a new Apple branded netbook, or a new iPhone/iPod Touch gizmo on steroids. Or could it even be something entirely else all together?


All we know for sure, is that Apple is up to something and that the details of just what it is, is rather, unfortunately, skimpy at the moment. It's that skimpy part that has got everyone's tongues wagging and all of the tech world all speculating as to what it might be.


Of course, a few things that we do know is that Apple, according to DigiTimes, has placed orders from Wintek for a bunch of 9 or 10 inch touch screens. Such screens could be used, of course, in the building of a netbook, but, on the other hand, they could also be used to build something entirely else such as a super-sized iPod Touch! Possibly too, they could be planning to introduce an Apple tablet PC. After all, OWC builds and sells such a model built from the parts of a white MacBook. So far, the reviews of this Mac Tablet have been quite favorable, so maybe that's what Apple is working on, who knows?


The one thing that we do know is that Apple's lips are sealed as tight as ever and all of this secrecy gives what ever it is an irresistible air of mystery. It's that mystery that virtually guarantees that what ever Apple is up to, it will automatically generate a lot of interest and a lot of press that should help to guarantee the mysterious product's success. You have to give it to Apple's when it comes to marketing, they really know how to galvanize the press better than any other one around.


Writing in Seekingalpha, Joel West, asks the following pertinent questions:


Is it a large iPhone or a small MacBook?

Is it designed for standing up or sitting down?

Does it have a keyboard?

Does it work with the iPhone App Store?

Does it connect to a phone network?

Is it priced like a netbook ($400-$800) or like a MacBook ($1000+)?

Like Joel, I too believe that whatever it is that Apple is secretly cooking up, it will definitely run on OS X and that it won't be exclusive to AT&T. As Joel mentions, cheap netbooks are the only real growth that we are seeing on the Wintel side these days and it's important for Apple to grab as much of that market as it can now to boost OS X's penetration. Nobody is necessarily getting rich building and selling these low cost machines, which is one of the reasons Apple has been so reluctant in entering the netbook space. However, if and when the economy ever does improves, I believe that Apple would not only presently make market gains in the netbook space now, but, in the future, it would eventually pave the way for even greater future sales and market share gain for Apple's much more expensive and traditional products. In other words, Apple could use OS X, on cheap netbooks now, to act as a type of bait, allowing people to expensively learn just how much better it is to any of the alternative OS's out there. This, I believe, could pay off in big market share gains for OS X.


Of course, a lot of people firmly believe that Apple will never, ever, in a million years build a netbook. Some of these people, like Bambi Brannan, thinks that Apple would most likely produce a super iPod Touch like device, a device that she simply calls an iPad. She states:


"..... Apple will not make a Mac, a Mac as we know it, at the typical price points for PC netbooks. Instead, Apple will expand the iPod line with a model that redefines the category - an iPad, if you will.


The iPad will be larger than iPhone or iPod, with a larger screen, multi-touch, of course. It'll also come with built in WiFi, plenty of memory for storage (up to 64-giabytes), perhaps a pop out, flip open keyboard, and run AppStore applications.


What's it good for? Email, web browsing, music, movies, mini-apps and utilities, and all the things you get in the current iPod touch, but more an bigger. What's the price?


Apple will price the iPad at $399 for the basic model and scale upwards to $699 with more memory (perhaps the keyboard), video camera with iChat and VOIP capability, and a few other features."


I agree 100 % with Bambi. Apple has said that it has some interesting ideas when it comes to netbooks and that they were studying them, but from listening to Steve Jobs, it's obvious it's not something that seems to be that high up on their list of priorities. The iPhone/iPod Touch is already a type of netbook, but only a lot, lot smaller. With over 27,000 programs in it's software library it would make sense for Apple to try and capitalize on that particular strength. All it would have to do is simply oversize what they have already been successfully doing with the iPhone and iPod by giving them a bigger screen, bigger and more powerful cpu's and possibly a pull-down, flip-up keyboard and presto, you would have something much like that of a netbook, but only better! I'm a little skeptical about the physical keyboard though, but a larger Haptic touch keyboard is a really big possibility. Apple, it must be remembered, is now also a semiconductor company as well, and unlike most other netbook OEMs, it can now design and build it's own unique chips that would make any new mystery Apple product all the more powerful, capable, useful and totally untouchable by it's competitor's! Apple's uni-body construction methods would also be something it's competitor's couldn't match as well and be another very big selling point.


In other words, even though we may not know exactly what Apple is up to, as always is the case with Apple, we can still, however, all be pretty dang-toothing sure, that whatever it is, be it a netbook in the traditional sense of the word, or some type of super sized iPhone/iPod, or an entirely new product category altogether, whatever it is - it will probably turn the market on it's head and send the competition in overdrive.


Even though the economy is in dire straights, none-the-less, Apple seems determined to ride out the storm by expanding the number of it's Apple stores and by increasing it's R&D budget in order to build newer and more innovative products. There are now even reports that Apple is looking into using, in higher end models anyway, OLED'S! And, in addition, at least according to some of these Taiwanese sources, when it comes to Apple's new gizmo, "There are some new features", but what these additional new features will be, I have no clue?


I am confident, however, that we shall soon see some kind of new Apple product that will answer the call of the netbook craze without necessarily being a netbook. I think it will be, as Billy Crystal used to say, "Absolutely fabulous!" It will be a capable, functional, innovative, down-right cool and possibly even a revolutionary gizmo to boot. I also expect it to arrive either by this summer or, at the latest, early this fall and, hopefully, in time for the holiday buying season. Be it by the summer, or be it in the fall, it won't be that long now before we know exactly what it is. By then Apple's mystery product, of course, will be no longer just that - mysterious!


In the meantime, rest assured, we haven't heard the last of the rumors on this one. As the we near it's release we shall see ever more rumors regarding this mysterious device. Some of the rumors will be partially right, some will be totally wrong and others still totally on the spot. In the meantime, it will be hard for some of us Apple watchers, including myself, as we wait and try to sort out all the facts from the fiction, but on the other hand, it should also be a lot of fun too.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Wednesday, March 11, 2009


Apple mock up photo via: VentureBeat

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Rare Prototype iPhone's Offered On eBay



If your a fan of the iPhone and a collector to boot, namely a collector with a lot of money, then rejoice! Yes, that's because you can now bid on a working iPhone prototype - a rare collector's item if ever there was one! Imagine having one of the very few prototype iPhone's in existence. Not too many collector's will get the bragging rights to a gem like this, so hurry on over to eBay**(this link is no longer valid!) and make an offer while you still can. Currently, as of this writing, the bid is $1,625 U.S. (it was $620 when I first checked!) , but by the time the bidding is over, well, who knows what it will be when the auction closes in the next day or so, so if your interested don't wait a second longer.


As you can see from the openning photo and the photos below, the software on this particular prototype looks rather crude in comparison to what Apple is actually shipping these days, but, hey ...... it works! As a bonus, when you buy this particular working prototype you will also receive - absolutely free - a second non-working prototype! No charge for the second one baby!



As iLounge pointed out, Apple will probably try it's best to shut down this auction, so if your interested, bid quickly and bid highly! This baby, the working one anyway, comes complete with a plastic matte screen so you know it's a rare find. The none-working prototype comes with a glass screen and as you can see, on the working prototype, the OS still has a lot of very rough edges. To me it looks rather primitive when compared to the refined iPhone that we all know and love today. The present owner claims that when making calls, with his AT&T sim card, it works great, but even though the internet works, it works similar to all of the ordinary mobile browsers that came before the iPhone's current browser (Safari).



If your going to bid on this historical collector's item then I wish you the best of luck. You can catch more photos of this baby by clicking on it's Ebay page before it closes, or two, Apple legally prevents it's sale! By the way, if it helps, please note that both phones come with their very own protective cases and a few scratches, but otherwise they are both cosmetically in good shape.


Happy bidding.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Tuesday, March 10, 2009


Photo via: Engadget , via iLounge, via, iFun.de (yeah - Deutschland!)


** UPDATE: For reasons unknown, this auction is no longer valid. Whether Apple legal pulled it, or the owner, we don't know, but the eBay link is now invalid!

Monday, March 9, 2009

Rumors: Apple Building Secret NetBook for the Summer?


It seems that netbooks are all the rage these days and calls for Apple to produce one of their own seems to be all I hear from the tech pundents. Netbooks may be cheap, underpowered, and mini versions of laptops, but they are having a very big impact, grabbing increasing market share in the process, which is, of course, one of the main reasons, besides the recession, that people are demanding that Apple build it's own.


Of course, Apple is Apple and it tends to 'think different' than most other companies, and they have stated repetitively that they are not interested in netbooks. Steve Jobs himself said something to the effect that Apple didn't know how to make a $500 device that would be anything but junk. However, Apple did say that they had some pretty interesting ideas on how to build a netbook, which rather makes wonder if they will, or if they won't, jump into the market.


I have lost track on how many journalists and how many articles they have written insisting that Apple must build a netbook or suffer the consequences . These journalists, like Preston Gralla, writing for Computerworld, have been hitting hard on the Apple netbook theme with articles such as, " Why Apple will have to release a netbook ." They point out that Apple's traditional higher products are already being hit hard and that the lack of an Apple netbook will eventually hit them even harder, like the old proverbial run away freight train.


In his latest post, Preston Gralla writes:


"In addition, Microsoft designed Windows 7 to run well on netbooks. And just recently, the company also announced that it is developing a netbook-version of Office. It's mum on what that means, but expect it to be very low-priced, or possibly ad-supported and free.

Apple would do well to learn from Microsoft here, and take advantage of the netbook market. After all, Microsoft has taken quite a bit from Apple over the years --- Apple should now return the favor and target netbooks."


To a point, I agree with Preston. However, if the Chinese Commercial Times and DigiTimes of Taiwan are correct, well, Mr. Preston Gralla and others may be about to get their wish very, very soon, because according to reports, Apple may now indeed be actively in the process of building and releasing such a netbook as we speak, and one that could possibly see the light of day in the third quarter of this year! Digitimes is now reporting that Taiwan's Windtek will be supplying touch screens for some new Apple products and the speculation is that some of those new products will include one or more netbooks. The Commercial Times also states that Quanta Computer will assemble any Apple netbook. Sounds good, if that is the case, but, as usually, Apple is being as tight lipped as ever.


So, despite Apple's claims to the contrary, other than simply studying it, could it be that they are now actually in the process of producing a netbook as the Asian press speculates? And just what would any Apple netbook look like? Would it simply mirror what we see in other netbooks, or will it be radically different?


If you ask me, Apple being Apple, I would bet my last pair of starched underwear that any possible Mac netbook would indeed be radically different from any other netbook out there. Apple doesn't just 'talk different', it really does 'think different' and 'acts differently', leading me to believe that any new Apple netbook should end up being somewhat of a 'different' kind of beast. Would it have a real physical keyboard as illustrated (shown above) in a recent Engadget's report, or would it have an iPhone like touchscreen keypad such as Gizmodo's recently shown below? Personally, there is no doubt, in my mind, that the latter would be the case more than the former. Apple, especially under Steve Jobs, has always champion the idea that 'less is more' and I don't see why that wouldn't be the case here.



The smaller iPhone touch screen keyboard is great, but on the larger real estate offered by a netbook, especially if it offers Haptic feed back, it would be radically better and it makes a lot of sense the more I think of it. I love the Haptic feed back that certain other phones feature and I think that it would be, on a much larger canvas, a superior experience and one close to that of using an actual physical keyboard. Apple already has stated that they had some pretty interesting ideas regarding any netbook. Imagine if such a netbook offered a built-in iPhone? This would make such a netbook a super sized iPhone and even though you couldn't exactly slip it in your pocket, like currently, it would still give you possibilities that no other regular sized mobile or netbook could now offer. Also, think of the App Store and the now over 25,000 apps it features. Imagine if the App Store and it's apps could be adapted to run on an OS X netbook? It would give Apple the main selling feature of Windows on the desktop - namely, the most apps ever!


For now, Apple has only stated that they are watching the nascent netbook market. They haven't committed themselves to anything, but if DigiTimes and the Commercial Times are correct, Apple could possibly shake up the netbook market in the way that they have already demonstrated in the mobile and music space with the iPhone and iPod. Windows XP has already blown past Linux in netbook market share, even though it was previously hoped that netbooks would finally bring Linux mainstream. Sadly, for Linux, Microsoft has not only put that to rest with XP, but they are now saying that Windows 7 will be even more successful than XP! The very real possibility that both XP and Windows 7 will drown out Linux on netbooks is not something I'm looking forward to. We need more choices then either Microsoft or Linux. When it comes to netbooks we should also have the choice of being able to use OS X, be it from an Apple netbook, or simply by licensing OS X to netbook OEM's on other netbooks!


Just as some where hoping that the netbook craze would dramatically grow Linux's market share, so too would it do for OS X! Even though I would love to see Apple produce it's own dedicated netbook, I still would rather see Apple simply license OS X to other netbooks makers. Yes, even though I'm totally convinced that Apple would make the best dang netbook out there, the most important thing would be to license OS X, thus allowing OS X's market share to sky rocket, exposing more and more people to the benefits of an OS other than that from Microsoft.


Netbooks, to my way of thinking, are only a short gap measure. In these difficult economic times where people are pinching pennies, netbooks make sense. In better times, however, netbooks are simply not powerful enough to meet the demands and the needs of most users. This means that, after hooking them on netbooks, Apple would be very well positioned to entice OS X netbook users to upgrade to it's much more powerful, much more capable, more expensive and vastly more desirable laptops, and desktops, if and when the economy eventually improves.


Of course, all we have now are hints that Apple may be coming out with a netbook, a touch screen one at that. Windows XP and 7 and Linux are all capable of running fast and efficiently on netbooks. How about OS X? I'm convinced that it will run just as well, if not better. The proof - it already runs beautifully on even smaller devices - the iPhone and iPod Touch! OS X should be able to equal, if not out perform Windows 7, XP or Linux on netbooks. In fact, it might even be a far superior experience! That's because Snow Leopard promises to offer new, under-the-hood, Apple technologies such as Open CL and Grand Central that will give it the edge in everything, including netbooks! Snow Leopard will be dramatically slimmed down, faster, more secure and stable, and, as a direct result, should be primed to become the perfect OS for a netbook, which frankly, due to their paltry hardware specs, could use all the help they can get.


Personally, netbooks are just a curiosity to me, because they are simply too underpowered. For people of like mind, they pose no real threat to Apple's existing laptop line, so Apple shouldn't fear licensing OS X at least on netbooks. The only real value, the only real desirability of netbook's are their lower cost and their portability! I would much rather, for example, loose or have a netbook stolen than that of loosing an expensive MacBook, and for those reasons they have great value as great travel accessories, but nothing more.


Still, in conclusion, I want to see Apple build it's own netbook, or better yet, to simply license OS X to netbook OEM providers. The main reason, as stated earlier, is to see OS X quickly gain greater market share, as well, to seeing it shake the current netbook foundation to the ground. I want to see how Microsoft's responds, and to see how the Linux world reacts. Not because I hate either OS, because I like and use them both, but rather simply because I believe that by bringing Apple's considerable innovation to this nascent market, it should end up resulting in more serious competition and innovation on the part of Microsoft, Linux and Apple, as well, that should prove in the end, in being beneficial to both the netbook market, as a whole, and to that of it's users, you and me.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Monday, March 09, 2009


UPDATE: CNet's Executive Editor, David Carnoy, has this interesting theory that all Apple has to do is to considerably lower the cost of the MacBook Air and - presto - you would automatically end up with the coolest and most desirable netbook of them all! I like that theory, but, most likely, it won't happen. Bummer!



Friday, March 6, 2009

Blasts-From-The-Past: Strange and Odd Looking Computers


If you feel bad that you can't afford a new computer, one with faster graphics, processing, video, or what have you, don't feel too bad. You could be stuck with some of these strange looking computers from the past. These 'blasts-from-the-past' cost considerably far more than any of today's MacPro's, iMac's, HP Voodoo's, or Dell's Alien line of computers too!


That would include computers like the one above, the Control Data super computer, the world's first - the CDC 6600. This is indeed a strange looking computer with it's twin spherical monitors. This computer was designed by Seymour Cray and came with an original cost of $6,000,000, so it wasn't exactly a personal computer in any sense of the word, but it certainly was strange looking! To me it almost looks like some kind of robot.



Above we see a picture of the $6,000 Macintosh Tempest TPI 863T. This computer is not that bad looking, but it certainly was strange for an early Mac. This is nothing more than an original Mac Plus that was repackaged to confirm to Tempest RF shield milspecs, namely electronic products that were shielded, suppressed in order to control compromising EMF emanations to and from telecommunications and informational system equipment. The TPI 863T is a computer that I remember seeing in the old Mac magazines and I remember too how much better it looked at the time then the original Mac Plus, but now, looking back it certainly looks a wee bit strange to me now.



Again, to the left we see a Scelbi-8H computer that hails back way back from the year 1973. This was a computer that preceded the Altair computer, a computer in which many people falsely consider to be the first digital computer. It's not, but certainly it's very interesting and strange looking to say the least.




Also, to the left we find the equally fascinating and equally strange looking computer, the Intel SIM4. If your tempted to laugh, please don't. In it's day this little thing was, no doubt, the very state of the art in micro-electronics. No, it wasn't the very first personal computer either, but it was indeed the very first microcomputer ever produced.




To the left we find again yet another strange and fascinating computer, the HP 9830 from 1972. I could be wrong, but I wouldn't try to run Solitaire let alone Crysis on this thing, as something tells me it would, at the very least, run somewhat slowly! To me, this looks more like a glorious oversize calculator, if anything, but it's a real honest-to-goodness programmable computer with BASIC in ROM and was marketed by HP rather quietly to scientists and engineers.


The Kenbak-1, which was introduced in 1971, is also shown on the left. This was another funny looking device that was at least small and affordable enough for us average Joe's. It's considered to be one of the earliest of all personal computers and, as such, it's an extremely rare and highly sought after and prized collector's item.


Absolutely, without a doubt, one of the most fascinating and strangest of all looking computers - ever - has to go to the Paperclip computer. This computer was actually only the plans for a computer that was published in a book by Alcosser, Phillips, and Wolk in 1967. This computer was a simple computer that could be built by the reader with just ordinary household items, such as tin cans and, of course, as the name implies, paperclips.




However, for us lazy types, seen above, is the Arkay CT-650, which was a professionally produced version of the Paperclip computer that was built and sold for $1,000! Wow, and people tell me Mac's are too expensive these days....... pleeezzze! Be sure to click the above photo for a larger and better look at this amazing and strange contraption.


Our last 'blast-from-the-past' features the affordable Heath kit EC-1 which sold for under $200. Of course, in 1959 $200 was probably considered big bucks. This looks, to me anyway, more like some type of amplifier than a computer and I honestly don't know if you could hook it up to a monitor or what? Not even sure what you could do with such a machine back then, let alone what you could possibly use it for today? None-the-less, this would make a very valuable collector's item for sure. I'm not sure about you, but from the back of the EC-1, it is quite obvious that this thing doesn't seem to have enough wires for my taste ! Oh well, it was a start!


Many thanks to Blinkenlights.com and others for the rundown on these strange and fascinating 'blasts-from-the-past'. Somehow, the next time I feel a tad bit jealous that I can't afford to buy the next MacPro or Alien computer, well, at least I can reflect on these strange, but wonderful, relics from the past and, hopefully, then I won't feel so bad! At the very least these early creations help me to appreciate the incredible and almost unbelievable progress that has been made in computers, even the progress made in the past year or so, let alone the past half century.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Friday, March 05, 2009

Thursday, March 5, 2009

A Closer Video Look at the PearPC Mac Clone


I especially love all things German. I love the countryside, the cities, the villages, the language and I especially love the people. Germans are friendly, fun-loving and hardworking. When it comes to engineering, well, you won't find any better than the Germans as can be seen in their cars, cameras and other high tech gizmo's, and now thanks to the magic of YouTube we can now finally get to see, in the above video, the first German Mac clone actually running OS X Leopard, and running it fast. Why the thing seems to boot up in the blink of the eye, or as fast as a fly zeroing in on a pile of you-know-what? I must say, watching this thing boot up almost makes me feel like plunking down some hard earned cash.


The above video is in French, which shamefully, as a Canadian I can't speak (I'm a bad, bad Canadian boy!), as is also the video of the interior of the PearPC seen below. As you can see, from both the exterior and the interior videos of this German clone, it ain't very pretty or very German looking like at all. It seems to work great mind you, as do most German built things, but man, oh man - is this thing ugly, or what? Yes, this thing might be German - aber dieses Ding ist hässlich! Sehr, sehr hasslich!



This particular Mac clone goes for about 700 Euro's, which isn't too bad of a price considering what you get. That price includes a 750GB hard drive, a 2.66 Duo Core Intel cpu, 4GB RAM and a sealed boxed copy of OS X Leopard. There is no blue-tooth, but it's an option. All-in-all, not a bad little package even though it looks like hell. When I look at all those sexy German cars and all of those beautiful German women, etc., it's hard for me to believe it actually comes from one of my favorite countries. However, if you want one, well you better act fast. This is because, as Engadget pointed out, even the German manufacturer's, HyperMegaNet doesn't think it will be around too long themselves! Below we find a video of the box in which the PearPC comes in. Personally, if you ask me, the box is better looking than the actual computer enclosure!



I don't know, maybe someday this thing might just become an historic collector's item, ugly or not? Hmmm... maybe I should buy one as an investment myself?


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Thursday, March 04, 2009



YouTube videos: via Cult-of-Mac

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

New Mac Keyboard: For Better Or For Worse?


Apple's new Mac updates have come with a bit of a surprise - a new standard and shortened keyboard. The new shorten keyboard looks exactly like the wireless keyboard in size, shape and number of keys, or the lack there of. Of course, the big difference is that the new keyboard has a wire running from it, an ugly old wire, so is the new keyboard for the better or for the worse?


I, for one, don't like the newer version. I much prefer the older one which has more functionality given those extra numeric keys. I also simply like the look and feel of the numeric keyboard, and even though some people may not use or need that numeric keypad as much, for others, like myself, it's a real must have. When I first saw the previous super-thin keyboards I was completely aghast! I thought, how could they possibly even consider such a thing? It was too small, too flimsy looking, and those dinky, little, weeny sized keys....... I mean, come on, how could anyone who was anybody possibly type anything on any of those things?


I was wrong, of course, totally dead wrong and I admit it.


Yes, as I found out rather quickly, the very first time I used one, these new keyboards were far more than usable - they were preferable! I found that contrary to what I was expecting, I could actually type faster and better on those tiny Chiclets sized keys after all! The smaller wireless version of this keyboard is ok, but when you give it a cord it is not exactly what I would call an improvement. The good thing, however, is that Apple gives you option of replacing the new wired keyboard with the old one as a 'no cost' option when ordering a new Mac. Some people may actually like the newer wired keyboard and all I can say is they can have it. It's not for me, I'll take the older numeric keyboard any old day.


As much as I like the previous keyboards, both the wireless version and the numeric, and as much as I hate the new wired shortened keyboard, there is one keyboard that I'm dreaming that Apple would come out with, and one that I think they will eventually do, namely - a multi-touch version! Yes, that's right, just as you have probably guessed, Apple could easily come out with a keyboard similar to the ones built into the MacBooks - complete with that giant multi-touch track pad!


How cool would that be? Very, very cool if you ask me!


This would be perfect in many ways, as it would suddenly add multi-touch gesturing to not only newer Mac's, but the older ones as well! That sure as hell would beat adding an expensive touch screen I would think, wouldn't you? Microsoft is touting the advantages of multi-touch in Windows 7 - hah! Windows 7 approach means that most PC's out there would not be able to run it without considerable and expensive modifications. In many cases, that only would entail adding an expensive touch screen, but a lot of machines might have to have their hardware beefed up in order to support such a screen! Not pretty and not cheap.


The multi-touch track pad keyboard, of course, would avoid all of that nasty mess, and those nasty associated costs. Considering that such a keyboard would sell for a fraction of the coast of a touch screen, I'm really quite amazed that Apple hasn't pushed the idea of a multi-touch keyboard sooner. To my way of thinking - it's a natural. One of the big advantages of such a keyboard would be in helping to avoid the possibility of repetitive strain injury to the wrists or arms that I found when personally using the HP Touch Smart screen! Don't get me wrong, touch screens are nice and all, and they certainly have their place, but they are not the type of thing that you would want to use all day long. I found that out the hard way after using the Touch Smart playing Mahjong. It's simply not natural to hold your arms up in a certain position for too long, otherwise there is a price to pay and that price is usually paid in pain! Don't believe me? Just try and hold your arms up for ten minutes straight and see what I mean? You can move your arms and wrists all around, up and down, but after awhile your arms at least will begin to feel the strain and the pain!


Ouch!


For most things that you can do on a vertical touch screen, you can just as easily do on a smaller and flatter track pad keyboard, but with much less risk of injury to your wrists or arms. I think that there is a need for both touch screens and multi-touch track pad keyboards, but for prolong use and for safety considerations, as well as the cost, multi-touch keyboards are the way to go.


So, is the new shorten standard keyboard for better, or is it for the worse?


As a standard keyboard, for me anyway, it's definitely for the worse. However, because you can easily have it replaced with the original standard keyboard, it's really somewhat moot of a point. If, on the other hand, Apple were ever to introduce a standard wired multi-touch track pad keyboard, or an optional wireless version, well that would be definitely for the better and I can only hope that Apple sees the light and offers it before someone else beats them to the punch.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Wednesday, March 04, 2009


Tuesday, March 3, 2009

The New Mac's Are Very Exciting, But Oh So Very Boring!


The new iMac's, Mini's and MacPro's are here!


Finally!


First off is a brand new Mac Mini that now features the same NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics that has done absolute wonders for the MacBook. This is a great leap forward from the previous Mini and should be a welcome addition, since Apple claims that it gives a whopping five times the performance of the older model. The new Mini comes in both a $600 version, complete with 1GB of RAM and a 120GB hard drive, and a higher end version featuring 2 GB RAM and a 320 GB hard drive. Both versions of the Mini run 2.0 GHz Core Duo processors. All-in-all, a nice upgrade especially considering it's better graphics and the now included five USB ports, and it's one 800 MB FireWire port.


When it comes to the iMac, well, there's a newer, cheaper and more powerful 24 inch model with a starting price of $1,499. This includes a 2.66 GHz Duo Core processor, 4 GB RAM (nice, very nice!), 8x double-layer SuperDrive and NIVIDIA's GeForce 9400M built-in graphics. The hard drive capacity is now 540 GBs, the same as the $1,799 mid-range model. This mid-range model sports the much more powerful NIVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 256 MB memory. The top model weighs in with a 1 TB hard drive and NIVIDIA GeForce GT 130 sporting 512 MB of video. This high-end will set you back $2,199 and sports a 3.06 GHz Inteld Core 2 Duo, compared to the middle range's 2.93 GHz version.


Now for the mother of all Mac's, the really Big Mac of the family, the Mac Pro. This beast comes in two versions, a 4 core version and a 8 core version. The Quad-Core starts at $2,499, a tad bit more than your high-end iMac and at this price point it might tempt some potential iMac buyers. For your $2,499 bucks you get a machine that boasts one 2.66 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" processor with 3 GB of RAM, a 64o GB hard drive, 18x double-layer SuperDrive and a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512 MB of video. Now if you just happen to have a spare $3,299 for the top-end Mac Pro, you'll get two lovely next-generation Intel Quad-Core running at 2.26 GHz. Also included in the basic price is a 18x double-layer SuperDrive and a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512 GB of video.


Unfortunately, what the new iMac's don't have is those speculated Intel i7 quad chips that were really hoped for! Neither is there that speculated 28 inch model to be seen anywhere? When it comes to the Mac Pro, it's also no go for a redesigned enclosure that was also speculated to becoming. The current enclosure is certainly nice, but come on, its' been ages and if the MacPro needs anything it is a new, sexier enclosure. So what gives Apple? I must say that I'm personally bummed out on the above omissions!


Still, the truth is that new offerings are nice, but just not as nice as they could have been otherwise. The new iMac's at least can now accommodate a whopping 8 GBs of RAM! Yeah on that one, but just don't buy it from Apple - that's an extra $1,000 bucks! Yucky, yucky, yucky, I say! I'm sure that you can buy 8 GBs or RAM a lot cheaper else where, but I have yet to check that out. The iMac uses the super fast DDR3 SDRAM which I like, but at an extra $1,000, well that is almost as much as the price for the also new iMac 20 inch model that goes for $1,199! There is now only one single model of the 20 inch featuring 2 GB of RAM, a 320 GB hard drive, 8x double-layer SuperDrive, 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo cpu and a NVIDIA GeForce 9400M built-in graphics.


In conclusion, even though I'm very disappointed in the new offerings, I still really like the new offerings simply because they are a much better bargain then the previous models, but then again, I wouldn't say I'm jumping up head over heels about them either! They are definitely better than their predecessors and offer better bang for the buck, but fall short of what I was expecting and hoping for. Oh well, hope springs eternal and there is always this coming fall - you never know, maybe, just maybe, I will get the Mac of my dreams then? In the meantime, even though I'm not sure I can afford one, I have this sneaky feeling that I will probably break down and buy the top end iMac with that 8 GB of RAM anyway, but only if I can find the RAM somewhere else at considerably less that the $1,000 premium that Apple is demanding.


In conclusion, the new Mac's are all so very exciting, but, sadly, at the same time they are also so very, very boring!


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Tuesday, March 03, 2009


Monday, March 2, 2009

Safari 4.0 Beta - Does It Really Make A Difference and Does It Really Matter?


Apple recently released a beta copy of Safari 4.0 beta with much fan fair, but does it really matter? Can Safari really make a difference, and can it really make a major impact in the market place? Well, naturally, that would depend on who you would ask.


Some people, such as Paul Thurrott, think not. In a recent post, he basically states that Safari, more or less, is simply a copy or clone of Google's Chrome browser, which, of course, it's not. If anything, Chrome is a basically a copy of Safari, or should I say WebKit on which it is built. Even though WebKit was created by Apple you wouldn't know it from what Paul writes. It's as if Apple had nothing to do with it.


For the most part, when he writes things like, "Apple fanatics--you know, those idiots who would buy anything with an Apple logo on it--will get all giddy and clap like little girls at a Hannah Montana concert when they see Top Sites, the new default Safari 4 home page.", it's quite obvious and clear to me, that he is writing from a very bias point of view as far as Apple goes, and I, for one, can't take anything seriously that he writes about Apple. I just can't. To many he is nothing more than a paid Microsoft shill who's main purpose is to bash Apple at every opportunity, the truth be damed! Whether that is actually the case or not, I can't say, but I do find his opinions concerning Apple to be very suspect. For a guy who writes all about Microsoft Windows, it does seem a rather bit strange that he spends so much time discussing all things Apple. Tom Reestman, one of the best analytical writers out there, has a great post on Paul's recent Safari rant which you can read here. As usual, it's great reading and I highly recommend it.


Of course, on the other hand, other writers have also written and brought out some very valid complaints, but at least they don't dice the whole browser because of one or more grips. No one browser will appeal to everyone. No browser is perfect, especially more so for betas. We all have our own needs and wants, which is why having more choices is always such a good thing to have, and Safari 4.o is just another one of those choices, and, if you ask me, it's looking now to a good one.


Despite some complaints with the new beta, more writers seem to be writing some very positive things about Safari's latest beta. Nate Lanxon, writing for ZDNet, for example, did a post entitled, "Safari dominates browser benchmarks". His title basically says it all, despite anything that Paul Thurrott might say to the contrary! We don't have to depend on Apple's word for it either, because many independent sources have been systematically bench marking and confirming Apple's speed claims. Bench marks or not, all that I know is that everything I do seems a heck of a lot faster with Safari 4.0. In other words - it's freaking, freaking fast! In fact, this is the fastest browser that I ever used - bar none, and it renders page after page faster then all of the previous browsers that I have previously used to date by a good country mile. I don't need to read any benchmarks when I can plainly see the difference with my own two eyes! I was, quite frankly, not expecting to be as impressed as I was, but I was wrong and so far, this thing rocks and it rocks fast!


It's not only the speed factor either. No, over all I just find Safari 4.0 beta to be extremely stable and fun to use. I don't know why, and, quite frankly, I don't really care why, but this thing just seems to use up a lot less of my computers cpu cycles! I loved Safari 3.0, but it got to the point that it would eat up so much of my cpu cycles that it would eventually slow down and come to a pathetic and painful crawl - to the point I that couldn't or wouldn't dare use it! It was horrible! Again, I don't know whether it was due to my computer, or due to the browser itself, but Safari 3 for me got to be completely unbearable. It was so bad that for a time I made the Opera 10 beta my browser of choice until I recently returned to FireFox 3.1. That was before Safari 4.0, of course, which easily replaced all others as my primary browser. Safari 4.0 beta, thus far has performed extremely well. Not perfect mind you. There has been two occasions when it crashed without warning, but over all, I have been very, very impressed with it's performance and stability indeed. Thanks Apple.


In addition to Safari's 4.0 amazing rendering speed and it's stability, there is also the fun factor. That would include CoverFlow, which, if you ask me, is more than cool, but a fundamentally better way of searching through your history, as it allows you to easily see and spot what you are looking for. Unfortunately, at this point in time, it's also rather slow as others have mention. TopSites, like CoverFlow, is also interesting, but it's the sheer speed of the browser that is the main selling point here. "This is one fast browser," as Adrian Kingsley-Huge wrote for ZDNet, and it's that speed that has me glued to the Safari 4.0 beta. FireFox extensions, CoverFlow, etc., are all great, but nothing is as important as speed when it comes to using a browser and as long as Apple can keep up the speed, and keep the whole thing stable, then Safari 4.0 really does matter indeed, and I think that it really will make a big, big impact and difference in the browser space. I expect Safari's market share to rise when and after it goes gold.


In fact, concerning market share and making a big impact, I don't mean just for Mac users either, but for Windows users as well. There is no better proof of that, as pointed out by Miya Knights in a post for ITPro.com. In her post she states that, thanks to beta 4.0, Safari has now, and for the very first time ever, finally cracked the 10 percent of the browser market - worldwide! Wow, now that really is amazing and especially when you consider that before the beta, Safari actually dropped a tad bit in market share! This is one of the largest gains for any browser in such a short period ever! In fact, as Miya writes:


"By comparison, it took Microsoft six months before it reached the one per cent mark with its release of IE’s version 8 beta. Mozilla needed seven days to pass the one per cent mark with Firefox 3 beta and Chrome needed almost a month."


It appears that, despite anything that the Apple bashers might like to say or write, it seems that Safari is now on more and more people's radar these days. Whether or not Apple can maintain Safari's growing clout and attract an even larger share of the browser market will depend on how much more Apple can keep on innovating and on how fast it's competition can catch up by copying Safari or adding their own unique advantages? Just as Safari 4.0 copied cues from Chrome, Chrome itself is based on Apple's WebKit and it should be able to copy most of Safari's features, or advantages, without too much trouble. Time will tell, how the competition will respond, but in the meantime, what is important to note is that Safari 4.0 beta is just that - just a beta! Nothing more and nothing less! How will it perform after it goes golden? Will it basically be the same, or even better still? Personally, I think that it will be better, faster and have even more features! I just don't know to what degree that will be, but I'm hoping that it will be a lot.


Safari 4.0 beta, after all, certainly "shows a lot of promise" as Mark A. Kellner, writing for the Washington Times, recently observed, and it is "a big step forward" as Stephen Wildstrom wrote in BusinessWeek. Something tells me, however, that as good as the beta is overall, it's not the last we will see and hear from it. Sometime, possibly after Snow Leopard is released, Apple will add a lot more features and overall performance to Safari 4.0 then what we see now. In fact, I'm counting on it. At least on the Mac side, with Open CL and Grand Central and other features of the new 64 bit OS, I think that Safari is going to put all other browsers to shame not only for it's cool new features like CoverFlow, TopSites, etc., but above all for it's unbelievable speed, stability and overall performance! Trust me, on this one, we haven't seen anything yet!


So, in the end, does Safari really matter, and can it really make a huge difference in the overall makeup in the browser space? The short answer should be a resounding yes, but in truth I think it already has made an impact judging from the press! Not the biggest impact maybe, but it's still early in the game after all. When Safari leaves it's beta cocoon and it blossoms into it's golden master stage, then for Windows users, Safari 4.0 may prove to be irresistible after all and they may finally have a very serious reason to ditch FireFox and IE 8.0. On the Mac side, however, and for the reasons I have already highligted, it could prove, under Snow Leopard, to be sheer heaven!


So, in conclusion, I have to agree with ComputerWorld's Tom Yager, that so far as this beta is concerned, Safari 4.0 beta is nothing less than 'flat irresistible' and it's golden master release should be even more irresistible. A lot more so! I only wish now would be that Apple would also come out with a version for Linux and share the joy as well.


And that's my 2 cents 4 this Monday, March 02, 2009


Safari 4.0: Apple